2013
DOI: 10.1021/la402354r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Molecular Basis of dsRNA Recognition by Mss116p Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Free-Energy Calculations

Abstract: DEAD-box proteins are the largest family of helicase that are important in nearly all aspects of RNA metabolism. However, it is unclear how these proteins recognize and bind RNA. Here, we present a detailed analysis of the related DEAD-box protein Mss116p-RNA interaction, using molecular dynamics simulations with MM-GBSA calculations. The energetic analysis indicates that the two strands of double strands RNA (dsRNA) are recognized asymmetrically by Mss116p. The strand 1 of dsRNA provides the main binding affi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(92 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our results of MM‐GBSA, the binding free energy of MARV VP35 to dsRNA is only −18.17 kcal/mol. Compared with some other protein–dsRNA systems, binding free energies calculated by MM‐GBSA, the binding affinity of VP35 to dsRNA is low . This is consistent with the biological experimental result of VP35.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our results of MM‐GBSA, the binding free energy of MARV VP35 to dsRNA is only −18.17 kcal/mol. Compared with some other protein–dsRNA systems, binding free energies calculated by MM‐GBSA, the binding affinity of VP35 to dsRNA is low . This is consistent with the biological experimental result of VP35.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In recent years, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations combined with binding free‐energy calculations has been proven to be successful in exploring protein–protein, protein–DNA, and protein–RNA interactions . This method can provide not only plentiful dynamic structural information about the protein–RNA complex but also abundant energy information . Detailed information would contribute to further understanding of the essence of protein–RNA interaction and demonstrate the origin of the binding affinity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MM‐GB/SA methods implemented in AMBER 11 was applied to calculate the binding free energy between the ligand and the enzyme . The binding free energy (Δ G bind ) in MM‐GB/SA between a ligand (L) and a receptor (R) to form a complex RL was calculated as ΔGbind=Gcomplextrue(Greceptor+Gligandtrue) G=EMM+GsolTS EMM=Eint+Eele+Evdw Gsol=GGB+GSA …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46 However, this method can give a good rank of binding free energy for different systems, which has good correlation with experimental results. 47,48 Based on the results of MM-GB/SA (Table S1), the ΔG bind values of PT2399/0X3 in 3 models are similar, and we can find that no matter which model PT2399 may be in, its binding affinity is better than that of 0X3. This trend is consistent with the trend measured in experiments.…”
Section: The Different Binding Modes Of Pt2399 and 0x3mentioning
confidence: 91%