Exploring the link between Kirkpatrick (KP) and context, input, process and product (CIPP) training evaluation models, and its effect on training evaluation in public organizations of Pakistan

Khalid, Muhammad Maqsood; Rehman, Chaudhry Abdul; Ashraf, Muhammad

doi:10.5897/ajbm11.2087

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There are several variations of critical notes from researchers related to the use of CIPP and Kirkpatrick models in the evaluation of teacher competency development programs. Some critical notes are affirming the reliability of the evaluation model, identifying some of the weaknesses of the evaluation model operation and the idea of finding the interrelationship of the two evaluation models [10,12]. The following table describes the characteristics of the articles contained in the journal.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Referring to the article data in the table is also obtained information that both models have advantages and disadvantages according to the focus characteristics of the object evaluated. Cipp model has the advantage that it is suitable to evaluate the competency development program comprehensively, because evaluators can freely evaluate the program even though the program has not been started and at the same time can evaluate during the program [10]. Unlike the Kirkpatric model, it does not provide evaluator flexibility to evaluate training programs and the evaluation process can be done only when the program is implemented.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While the Kirkpatrick model conceptually provides a framework for evaluation of training programs based on four levels, namely reaction, learning, behavior and results. Despite frequent criticism, this model has reliability and credibility as an evaluation model that is still relevant [10]. Evaluation research with Kirkpatrick model on teacher development and training was able to clarify the perception of principal and supervisor trainees about the results of the training process.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

CIPP vs kirkpatrick in the evaluation of physics teacher competency development programs: literature study

Muqorobin

Komarudin

Badrujaman

et al. 2022

J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to systematically review and analyze the results of research on CIPP and kirkpatrick models in the evaluation of phisycs teacher competency development programs. This literature review is specifically intended to determine the advantages and disadvantages of both evaluation models in the implementation of program evaluation. The research method uses systematic studies through four stages, namely; identification, selection, feasibility and inclusion. Search articles using the Google Scholar, ERIC, Sciencedirect and SpringerLink databases. Based on the results of the study found 1115 research articles that discuss the use of CIPP and Kirkpatrick models in the evaluation of competency development programs. The articles are mostly published in the form of proceedings and international journals and research comes from several countries. The final results showed there were 18 studies discussing the use of CIPP and Kirkpatrick models to evaluate competency development and training programs. Recommendations of the results of the study, in order to be able to combine two models namely CIPP and Kirkpatrick as an alternative evaluation model, the goal is to get an overview of the results of the evaluation of phisycs teacher competency development programs more comprehensively especially in the program that contains training components.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

CIPP vs kirkpatrick in the evaluation of physics teacher competency development programs: literature study

Muqorobin

Komarudin

Badrujaman

et al. 2022

J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Untuk mengetahui efektifitas dan dampak nyata dari pelaksanaan program pengembangan yang berbasi pada kebutuhan dilakukan penelitian evaluasi dengan pendekatan mixed model yakni CIPP dan Kickpatrick (CILAPP) (Khalid et al, 2012;Muqorobin, Prayogi, 2022;Yetti Supriyati, 2021). Melalui penerapan mixed model CILAPP akan didapatkan gambaran konteks penelitian evaluasi program yang utuh dan saling melengkapi.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Evaluasi Kinerja Kawasan Agrowisata Ciwidey di Kabupaten Bandung

Dirapratama

Hendrakusumah²,

Pranggono³

2023

JPWK

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Perkembangan Kabupaten Bandung memperlihatkan kecenderungan pariwisata untuk menjadi andalan khususnya dalam menghasilkan pendapatan daerah. Pada kurun waktu 2014-2017 terjadi peningkatan jumlah wisatawan kurang lebih sebesar 1,1 juta wisatawan tiap tahunnya. Ini menandakan bahwa Kabupaten Bandung merupakan salah satu tujuan wisata yang menarik bagi wisatawan domestik maupun mancanegara. Salah satu potensi wisata di Kabupaten Bandung adalah Kawasan Agrowisata Ciwidey. Namun kawasan tersebut belum tergarap potensi wisatanya secara optimal, sehingga belum dapat memberikan kontribusi yang signifikan terhadap pertumbuhan dan pembangunan perekonomian di Kabupaten Bandung. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi kondisi kinerja pengembangan Kawasan Agrowisata Ciwidey, untuk mengevaluasi penerapan konsep ideal agrowisata yang dapat mendukung pengembangan Kabupaten Bandung, dan untuk mengidentifikasi kendala apa saja yang mempengaruhi pengembangan kawasan Agrowisata Ciwidey. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini bahwa Dinas Pariwisata dan Kebudayaan Kabupaten Bandung sudah berupaya dengan optimal dan telah berhasil melaksanakan program dan kegiatan sesuai dengan rencana yang telah di tetapkan sebelumnya, meskipun tidak secara spesifik menyasar pada pengembangan Kawasan Agrowisata Ciwidey. Terlihat dari prosentase tingkat pencapaian target sasaran dengan nilai melebihi apa yang telah di targetkan.

show abstract

“…From Kirkpatrick's model that will be used is level 2 (learning evaluation) and level 4 (result evaluation) (Khalid, 2012). Level 2 is used because participants are said to have learned if they have experienced changes in attitudes, improved knowledge, and improved skills.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Self-evaluation in Distance Education of Biology Program FKIP-Universitas Terbuka

Hutasoit,

Ratnaningsih,

Iryani

et al. 2023

jppipa, pendidikan ipa, fisika, biologi, kimia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this research is expected to help the S1 Biology Education Study Program FKIP-UT in improving academic and administrative services for users. In detail, the objectives of this study are: (1) The effectiveness of the services that have been provided by the Biology Education S1 Study Program FKIP-UT to service users; (2) Student services of the S1 Biology Education Study Program FKIP-UT; (3) Service user satisfaction of the S1 Biology Education Study Program FKIP-UT; (4) Characteristics of the learning process of the S1 Biology Education Study Program FKIP –UT; (5) Learning experience of service users of the S1 Biology Education Study Program FKIP-UT. The research used quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitative methods are carried out by surveying all graduates/ students using questionnaires [letters, forms]. While the qualitative method was carried out for limited respondents who were randomly selected proportionally through [online] interviews. The results of this study include data analysis of the effectiveness of services that have been provided by the Biology Education S1 Study Program FKIP-UT to service users, as many as 62.4% are satisfied with the Subject Material Books used, 48.5% are online tutorials, 41.3% Webinars and 56.2% are final exams. As many as 62% of respondents already know the student services of the S1 Biology Education Study Program FKIP-UT regarding reasoning, interests and talents, 60% regarding career guidance and 45.8% regarding welfare and easy access. Satisfaction with the learning experience in the S1 Biology Education Study Program, respondents were satisfied and very satisfied in discussions, tutorial assignments, practices and practicums. With respondents who are dissatisfied with academic and administrative services, it is necessary to improve services and socialization for those who have difficulty accessing services.

show abstract

Exploring the link between Kirkpatrick (KP) and context, input, process and product (CIPP) training evaluation models, and its effect on training evaluation in public organizations of Pakistan

Cited by 7 publications

References 17 publications

CIPP vs kirkpatrick in the evaluation of physics teacher competency development programs: literature study

CIPP vs kirkpatrick in the evaluation of physics teacher competency development programs: literature study

Evaluasi Kinerja Kawasan Agrowisata Ciwidey di Kabupaten Bandung

Self-evaluation in Distance Education of Biology Program FKIP-Universitas Terbuka

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About