2022
DOI: 10.7748/ldp.2022.e2182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the knowledge of social care staff about learning disability: 20 years on

Abstract: Aims: An understanding of learning disability is important for ensuring people are identified and receive the support they need. This study aimed to explore the knowledge of the criteria for learning disability in community staff.Methods: A total of 264 social care staff were asked to provide their understanding of the term 'learning disability' and their responses were coded against the three diagnostic criteria.Results: The most commonly identified criterion related to intellectual functioning, with childhoo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, estimates of intelligence by parents, others, and self can be significantly influenced by factors other than actual cognitive ability, such as gender, culture, and educational background (e.g., Bian et al, 2017;Kirkcaldy et al, 2007;Swami et al, 2009). In addition, knowledge of intellectual disability is low in many staff groups (e.g., Emerson, Baines et al, 2012;McKenzie et al, 2022), suggesting that they may be poor at identifying indicators of intellectual disability. Using more formal measures, such as abbreviated or short forms of intellectual assessments, which have not specifically been designed as intellectual disability screening tools, can also have limitations, as outlined in the introduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, estimates of intelligence by parents, others, and self can be significantly influenced by factors other than actual cognitive ability, such as gender, culture, and educational background (e.g., Bian et al, 2017;Kirkcaldy et al, 2007;Swami et al, 2009). In addition, knowledge of intellectual disability is low in many staff groups (e.g., Emerson, Baines et al, 2012;McKenzie et al, 2022), suggesting that they may be poor at identifying indicators of intellectual disability. Using more formal measures, such as abbreviated or short forms of intellectual assessments, which have not specifically been designed as intellectual disability screening tools, can also have limitations, as outlined in the introduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%