Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2021.1897773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the interplay between attributions and metacognitive monitoring ability in a post-secondary classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
4
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Nietfeld, Cao, and Osborne (2005), the actual process of monitoring assists students in tracking their ongoing cognitive processes and using regulatory strategies with a view to competently coping with some learning-related situations. It is a fundamentally essential technique tapped by the learners for both inspecting their progress monitoring and applying their problem-solving skills in a well-reasoned fashion.…”
Section: Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Nietfeld, Cao, and Osborne (2005), the actual process of monitoring assists students in tracking their ongoing cognitive processes and using regulatory strategies with a view to competently coping with some learning-related situations. It is a fundamentally essential technique tapped by the learners for both inspecting their progress monitoring and applying their problem-solving skills in a well-reasoned fashion.…”
Section: Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es así como, se podría llegar a predecir con bastante razón que, aquellos estudiantes que atribuyen sus resultados al esfuerzo, una atribución de carácter interna, estable y controlable, tienen mayor probabilidad de obtener éxito en sus resultados académicos, que aquellos estudiantes que atribuyen sus resultados a la suerte, una causa de tipo externa, inestable e incontrolable. Las atribuciones de carácter interno se asocian a mejores desempeños académicos (Spencer et al, 2021). En cambio, aquellos estudiantes que presentan un bajo rendimiento tienden en general a poseer patrones atribucionales fundamentalmente externos (Rodríguez-Rodríguez & Guzmán-Rosquete, 2019), lo cual se explicaría por el hecho que para estos estudiantes sus resultados académicos no dependerían del esfuerzo involucrado en la tarea, sino que de aspectos externos e inmanejables (Lagos et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Metacognition is broadly defined as “cognition about cognition” and involves cognitive processes that take place on a “meta-level” requiring monitoring and control of cognition [ 24 ]. In the present study, the focus is specifically on metacognitive self-regulation which is defined as the regulation of cognitive processing (i.e., planning, monitoring, and regulating strategies) instead of metacognitive knowledge [ 25 ] since metacognitive self-regulation is considered a higher-order process that reflects students’ ongoing processing and strategies deployed to improve performance, rather than static general knowledge about the person, task, and strategies [ 26 ]. Motivation is broadly defined as the forces that make people act and academic motivation comprises self-beliefs of competence (e.g., self-efficacy), goals (e.g., goal orientations), and intrinsic (e.g., interest) and extrinsic (e.g., incentives) motivation, amongst others [ 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%