2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11524-011-9629-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Impacts of Safety Culture on Immigrants’ Vulnerability in Non-motorized Crashes: A Cross-sectional Study

Abstract: Pedestrians and cyclists are a vulnerable group of road users. Immigrants are disproportionally represented in pedestrian and cyclist crashes. We postulate that the mismatch in safety culture between countries of their origin and the USA contribute to their vulnerability in pedestrian and cyclist crashes. Over time, the differences may disappear and immigrants' traffic behavior gravitates toward those of native-borns. We describe this process as safety assimilation. Using the pedestrian and cyclist crash datab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While previous research indicates that older male students may, as a matter of choice, engage in higher risk activities that put them at greater risk for injury [16], this is not likely a similar pattern for new immigrant students. In this case, immigrant young people may be at greater risk as a result of transitions across different cycling environments and “safety cultures” for themselves and their families [34], or inadequate preparation or access to appropriate resources to support their safe cycling in Canada [35]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While previous research indicates that older male students may, as a matter of choice, engage in higher risk activities that put them at greater risk for injury [16], this is not likely a similar pattern for new immigrant students. In this case, immigrant young people may be at greater risk as a result of transitions across different cycling environments and “safety cultures” for themselves and their families [34], or inadequate preparation or access to appropriate resources to support their safe cycling in Canada [35]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, vulnerable road users, especially pedestrians (Yao et al, 2015) and cyclists (Vanlaar et al, 2016), have borne the traffic injury burden disproportionately. Among them, the weakest groups are the elderly (Loo and Tsui, 2016), children (DiMaggio et al, 2015) and the migrants (Chen et al, 2012). Car-free development, by removing private cars on roads and designing streets for people, has enormous potentials of achieving a multitude of sustainability goals of reducing environmental harm, supporting economic vitality and achieving social equity (Loo, 2002b), and contributing to the decoupling of economic growth with negative transport externalities, particularly carbon and traffic fatalities (Loo and Banister, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Travel by public transport is safer than other modes of road travel (WHO 2004). Furthermore, immigrants bring with them the attitudes, perceived social norms and practices of their countries of origin (Chen, Lin, and Loo 2012). There is evidence to show that immigrants are less likely to participate in risk-taking behaviors than the native counterparts (Norredam et al 2013;Xiang et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%