2010
DOI: 10.1108/02517471080000698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the impacts of intellectual property on intellectual capital and company performance: The case of Iranian computer and electronic organizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The dependent variable (organizational performance) was measured by using variables related to the Balanced Scorecard Method. The Balanced Scorecard Method has been widely used to measure organizational performance by using Likert-type scales (Namvar et al, 2010). study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependent variable (organizational performance) was measured by using variables related to the Balanced Scorecard Method. The Balanced Scorecard Method has been widely used to measure organizational performance by using Likert-type scales (Namvar et al, 2010). study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also evidence of a significant impact of knowledge capital on organizational performance (Lööf and Heshmati, 2002). Namvar et al (2010) have proven that intellectual property significantly influences human capital, relational capital and structural capital, which are positively related to firm performance. For gaining more value from knowledge, intellectual property is essential for companies to stay competitive.…”
Section: Manufacturing Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of those studies appear to have identified a positive relationship between a firm's investment in intellectual property and its business performance, and its financial performance in particular. Representative examples include: Anuar, et al (2012), wide variety of manufacturing industries in Malaysia; Bollen, et al (2005), pharmaceuticals industry in Germany; Bosworth and Rogers (2001), wide variety of large, publicly traded firms in Australia; Cohen and Kaimenakis (2007), service-sector firms in Greece; Graham and Sichelman (2008), literature survey and wide variety of technology start-up firms in the United States; Greenhalgh and Longland (2005), Greenhalgh andRogers (2006 &2007), wide variety of manufacturing firms in the United Kingdom; Hanel (2008), manufacturing firms from many industries in Canada; Hsu and Ziedonis (2013), semiconductor firms in the United States; Juma and McGee (2006), technology firms from eleven different industries in the United States; Lichtenthaler (2009), European-wide study, many industries; Namvar, et al (2010), electronics and computing firms in Iran; Pandit,, et al (2011), multi-national study, broad variety of technology-intensive industries and sectors; Roy (2013), information technology firms in India; and, Suh and Hwang (2010), computer software firms in South Korea.…”
Section: Intellectual Property and The Financial Performance Of Firmsmentioning
confidence: 99%