Exploring the impacts of caring for hospitalized COVID-19 patients on nurses: A qualitative descriptive study

Hosseini, Meimanat; Ghasemi, Saeed; Hejazi, Sima Sadat

doi:10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_49_22

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Firstly, in terms of cognition, it is important to improve self-efficacy through the continuous upgrading of professional skills and actively perceive the value and meaning of work to enrich job satisfaction ( 39 ). These actions are conducive to the fact that CDC emergency responders can perceive the good side of an undesirable work environment, refrain from thinking nonsense, and make cognitive regulations in the event of an adverse event such as a public health emergency.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and initial validation of the career resilience instrument for CDC emergency responders in China within the context of public health emergencies: based on a survey conducted in Shanghai

Wang,

Cheng,

et al. 2024

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundChina faces various public health emergencies, and emergency responders at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC emergency responders) are a mainstay in responding to public health emergencies. Career resilience can help CDC emergency responders to effectively respond to and recover from public health emergencies, but there is no specific measurement instrument available. In this study, we aimed to develop and conduct an initial validation of the career resilience instrument for CDC emergency responders in China within the context of public health emergencies from a process perspective.MethodsBased on a survey conducted in Shanghai, interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA), which is a qualitative research approach to describing and analyzing individual experiences, was used to analyze the interview texts to develop the initial career resilience instrument for CDC emergency responders. The initial career resilience instrument was revised through two rounds of expert consultation. Cronbach’s α coefficient and exploratory factor analysis were used to test the reliability and validity of the revised career resilience instrument.ResultsThe initial career resilience instrument for CDC emergency responders contained three first-level measurement dimensions, 9 second-level measurement dimensions, and 52 measurement items. After expert consultation, the first-level and second-level measurement dimensions were not revised, 13 measurement items were deleted or revised, and six measurement items were added, resulting in 48 measurement items. The revised career resilience instrument was tested for good reliability and validity.ConclusionCareer resilience for CDC emergency responders can be regarded as a set of protective factors and dynamic processes that can be cultivated and intervened in cognitive, affective, and behavioral dimensions to improve their ability to respond to and recover from public health emergencies.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%