2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-0979.2004.0330.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the impact of the implementation of a nursing clinical development unit program: What outcomes are evident?

Abstract: Nursing Clinical Development Units have become popular as a framework for the facilitation of the professional development of nursing and to contribute to improved outcomes for consumers of health care services. An exploratory evaluation of the Nursing Clinical Development Unit program implemented by the Centre for Psychiatric Nursing Research and Practice was undertaken using a qualitative approach. This paper focuses on the findings relating to outcomes. A number of positive outcomes were identified includin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nurses explained that it was necessary to have access to the results after carrying out the corresponding actions. They also observed that performing tasks properly was a source of dissemination in itself (Happell & Martin, 2004; Roberts et al, 2016). Many of the participants were proud to see the positive outcomes, which motivated them to improve the negative aspects (Sving et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nurses explained that it was necessary to have access to the results after carrying out the corresponding actions. They also observed that performing tasks properly was a source of dissemination in itself (Happell & Martin, 2004; Roberts et al, 2016). Many of the participants were proud to see the positive outcomes, which motivated them to improve the negative aspects (Sving et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is original and relevant because it addresses some issues, such as the novice researcher (Bailey, 2007;Clancy, 2007), that have been addressed elsewhere, but also puts those issues into a European and international research context, updates them and revisits concerns covered elsewhere (Happell & Martin, 2004) that remain relevant for today's new clinical researcher. It also identifies a particular issue about national attitudes and differences between countries and the attitudes that are fostered by those countries.…”
Section: Preliminary Aspects and Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is not a great deal of information in the Australian literature on how to undertake practice development (Happell 1997;Happell & Martin 2004). However, Greenwood and Parsons (2002) in their work in Western Sydney, Australia describe a three-way approach to practice development.…”
Section: How Is Practice Development Achieved?mentioning
confidence: 99%