2023
DOI: 10.1039/d3cp02034g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the impact of sodium salts on hydrotropic solubilization

Jordana Benfica,
Afonso C. Martins,
Germán Peréz-Sanchéz
et al.

Abstract: Some ionic liquids (IL) were shown to display a strong ability to enhance the solubility of phenolic compounds through hydrotropy. However, evidence shows that salt ions in hydrotropic aqueous solutions...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, solubility enhancement with hydrotrope concentration should attain a sigmoidal curve shape; however, here, all DES-based systems deviate from the sigmoidal shape perhaps because of the presence of specific interactions between ETA with DES. Similar findings have been reported in the literature earlier. The quantitative trend in water intake depends on the structure of the constituents of the DES. The initial maximum of w o observed for (Thy: DA) lies in the ETA concentration range between 0.9 and 1.5 M; for (Men: DA), it is between 0.8 and 1.6 M; for (Lin: DA), it is between 0.5 and 1.2 M; for (Cit: DA), it is between 0.5 and 1.1 M; and for (Ger: DA), it is between 0.7 and 1.8 M.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Ideally, solubility enhancement with hydrotrope concentration should attain a sigmoidal curve shape; however, here, all DES-based systems deviate from the sigmoidal shape perhaps because of the presence of specific interactions between ETA with DES. Similar findings have been reported in the literature earlier. The quantitative trend in water intake depends on the structure of the constituents of the DES. The initial maximum of w o observed for (Thy: DA) lies in the ETA concentration range between 0.9 and 1.5 M; for (Men: DA), it is between 0.8 and 1.6 M; for (Lin: DA), it is between 0.5 and 1.2 M; for (Cit: DA), it is between 0.5 and 1.1 M; and for (Ger: DA), it is between 0.7 and 1.8 M.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%