2019
DOI: 10.1177/0734282919867535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Impact of Q-Matrix Specifications Through a DINA Model in a Large-Scale Mathematics Assessment

Abstract: The demand for diagnostic feedback has triggered extensive research on cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs), such as the deterministic input, noisy output “and” gate (DINA) model. This study explored two Q-matrix specifications with the DINA model in a statewide large-scale mathematics assessment. The first Q-matrix was developed based on five predefined content reporting categories, and the second was based on the post hoc coding of 15 attributes by test-development experts. Total raw scores correlated strongly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, there are many applications use cross-sectional LDMs to diagnose individuals’ learning status in the field of mathematics because the structure of mathematical attributes is relative clear to be identified, such as fraction calculations ( Tatsuoka, 1983 ; Wu, 2019 ), linear algebraic equations ( Birenbaum et al, 1993 ), and spatial rotations ( Chen et al, 2018 ; Wang et al, 2018 ). Some studies also apply cross-sectional LDMs to analyze data from large-scale mathematical assessments (e.g., George and Robitzsch, 2018 ; Park et al, 2018 ; Zhan et al, 2018 ; Wu et al, 2020 ). However, most of these application studies use cross-sectional design and cannot track the individual growth of mathematical ability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are many applications use cross-sectional LDMs to diagnose individuals’ learning status in the field of mathematics because the structure of mathematical attributes is relative clear to be identified, such as fraction calculations ( Tatsuoka, 1983 ; Wu, 2019 ), linear algebraic equations ( Birenbaum et al, 1993 ), and spatial rotations ( Chen et al, 2018 ; Wang et al, 2018 ). Some studies also apply cross-sectional LDMs to analyze data from large-scale mathematical assessments (e.g., George and Robitzsch, 2018 ; Park et al, 2018 ; Zhan et al, 2018 ; Wu et al, 2020 ). However, most of these application studies use cross-sectional design and cannot track the individual growth of mathematical ability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Latent classification models are designed to classify the subject and help the subject find its place in the group. This test uses the DINA model ( Henson, 2005 ; Wu et al, 2020 ), which is a latent classification model that allows the data collected from student responses to be processed to analyze the individual’s knowledge status and mastery of cognitive attributes behind the scores ( de la Torre, 2011 ). Compared to other potential classification models, the DINA model not only portrays the mental processes of students during arithmetic, but also involves only two parameters, the miss parameter and the guess parameter, which are easy to implement for estimation of these two parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the outstanding characteristics of CDA is its assessment structure. Through a more operational and internally consistent Q-matrix, subjects' unobservable cognitive state can be linked to the observable item responses, which goes beyond the simple two-way list format Frontiers in Psychology 05 frontiersin.org (Wu et al, 2020). In this study, based on the final Q-matrix in Table 3, we selected 60 items from one of the large-scaled assessment tests Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) as the first round of items selected.…”
Section: Formation Of Assessment Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%