2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11092-014-9208-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the impact of cumulative testing on academic performance of undergraduate students in Spain

Abstract: Registro de acceso restringido Este recurso no está disponible en acceso abierto por política de la editorial. No obstante, se puede acceder al texto completo desde la Universitat Jaume I o si el usuario cuenta con suscripción. Registre d'accés restringit Aquest recurs no està disponible en accés obert per política de l'editorial. No obstant això, es pot accedir al text complet des de la Universitat Jaume I o si l'usuari compta amb subscripció. Restricted access item This item isn't open access because of publ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
17
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data were further analyzed to examine the cumulative formative assessments (overall unit tests average) and the summative assessment (final exam), similar to the studies of Adkins and Linville (2017) and Domenech et al (2015). A significant shift occurred between the unit tests average (M = 68.95%, SD = 15.61) and final exam average (M = 67.48%, SD = 16.11).…”
Section: All Three Courses Combinedmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The data were further analyzed to examine the cumulative formative assessments (overall unit tests average) and the summative assessment (final exam), similar to the studies of Adkins and Linville (2017) and Domenech et al (2015). A significant shift occurred between the unit tests average (M = 68.95%, SD = 15.61) and final exam average (M = 67.48%, SD = 16.11).…”
Section: All Three Courses Combinedmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Using multiple types of formative assessment, or informal assessment that is used to monitor student progress and does not equate to a grade or credit, is common in higher education and viewed as best practice. There is, however, debate over whether using more than one summative assessment to assess students on the same content or learning outcomes is beneficial or whether it is unnecessary and may even inhibit student learning (Beagley & Capaldi, 2016; Domenech, Blazquez, de la Poza, & Munoz‐Miquel, 2015; Lawrence, 2013).…”
Section: Defining “Double Assessment”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To employ effective strategies to enhance student motivation will provide better engagement and good effects on student performance (Liu et al, 2012;Domenech et al, 2015). During the first semester, the students apply the concepts acquired in SEF to carry out the first phases of a software engineering project which aims to develop an information system.…”
Section: Define Actions To Implement the Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%