2023
DOI: 10.1177/00472395231153187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Impact of a Serious Game in the Academic Success of Entrepreneurship Students

Abstract: Serious games are increasingly present in higher education and many researchers are reflecting on how to use them in the development and training of new skills. However, an unexplored area is the analysis of the impact that serious games have on students’ academic performance in an entrepreneurship course. In this sense, this study simultaneously seeks to explore the impact of the use of a serious game, titled FLIGBY, on the development of hard and soft skills through the use of a mixed methods approach, in wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, considering the construction of assessments using the AES system found one condition for shifting human raters, a computerbased formative assessment (Mao et al, 2018); analysis and prediction standard for evaluation (Atteveldt et al, 2021); and using statistical methods to analyze data reliability and planning reliability tests (Meeker et al, 2022). This change will later be proven by the relationship between the two where the antithesis results of the score produced as a consistency of responses in competency testing with essay answers; technology with ideas (Almeida & Buzady, 2023). Theoretically, a human rater with the assessment rubric from the conversion results of the AES system explains the correlation of knowledge and psychology using a statistics approach; psychometric answers the level of validity, reliability, and accuracy of the score results; as a standard point of competency assessment (Collier-Sewell et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, considering the construction of assessments using the AES system found one condition for shifting human raters, a computerbased formative assessment (Mao et al, 2018); analysis and prediction standard for evaluation (Atteveldt et al, 2021); and using statistical methods to analyze data reliability and planning reliability tests (Meeker et al, 2022). This change will later be proven by the relationship between the two where the antithesis results of the score produced as a consistency of responses in competency testing with essay answers; technology with ideas (Almeida & Buzady, 2023). Theoretically, a human rater with the assessment rubric from the conversion results of the AES system explains the correlation of knowledge and psychology using a statistics approach; psychometric answers the level of validity, reliability, and accuracy of the score results; as a standard point of competency assessment (Collier-Sewell et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%