2018
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201809702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the “Goldilocks Zone” of Semiconducting Polymer Photocatalysts by Donor–Acceptor Interactions

Abstract: Water splitting using polymer photocatalysts is a key technology to a truly sustainable hydrogen‐based energy economy. Synthetic chemists have intuitively tried to enhance photocatalytic activity by tuning the length of π‐conjugated domains of their semiconducting polymers, but the increasing flexibility and hydrophobicity of ever‐larger organic building blocks leads to adverse effects such as structural collapse and inaccessible catalytic sites. To reach the ideal optical band gap of about 2.3 eV, A library o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3.6 Å, 11 respectively (Figure S5). [16][17][18] Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of SNP-BDT1 and SNP-BDT2 networks confirm a 'cauliflower'-like morphology typical for nucleation-growth polymers, while the SP-BTT polymer grows in rod-like aggregates of 20 to 100 μm length (Figure S6-S8). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and selected-area electron-diffraction (SAED) for these three polymers confirm a similar degree of internal, microscopic structure as seen in PXRD data with visible, concentric rings indicative of polycrystalline materials (Figure S9-S11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3.6 Å, 11 respectively (Figure S5). [16][17][18] Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of SNP-BDT1 and SNP-BDT2 networks confirm a 'cauliflower'-like morphology typical for nucleation-growth polymers, while the SP-BTT polymer grows in rod-like aggregates of 20 to 100 μm length (Figure S6-S8). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and selected-area electron-diffraction (SAED) for these three polymers confirm a similar degree of internal, microscopic structure as seen in PXRD data with visible, concentric rings indicative of polycrystalline materials (Figure S9-S11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This has implications for the fluorescence life-times and the outstanding performance in photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water of these D-A materials. [17][18] In this study, we make use of four key-properties of our conjugated, porous D-A polymersnamely, (1) their strong, covalent backbones, (2) their intrinsic Lewis acidity and basicity, (3) their permanently accessible pore channels to gaseous guest molecules, and (4) their optical bandgaps in the visible part of the spectrum -and we use them as optical and electronic sensors and switches that are triggered by volatile acid vapors and re-set by gaseous ammonia. While colorimetric chemical probes are known from molecular systems in solutions, [19][20] or work on the basis of chemical transformations, [21][22][23] the here-presented study shows one of the first instances of amorphous porous conjugated polymers used as fully-reversible, colorimetric chemical probes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optical band gaps calculated from Tauc plots were about 2.25 eV, 2.36 eV and 2.34 eV for Py-HTP-BT-COF, Py-ClTP-BT-COF and Py-FTP-BT-COF (Figure 3 a), respectively, suggesting that all Py-XTP-BT-COFs are suitable for absorbing visible light for photocatalysis. [44] Meanwhile, the conduction band minimum (CBM) positions of Py-HTP-BT-COF, Py-ClTP-BT-COF and Py-FTP-BT-COF were estimated to be À2.76, À2.92 and À3.25 eV versus vacuum level, respectively, which should be able to reduce protons to H 2 . As shown in Figure 3 b, compared to the redox potentials (À4.02 eV versus the vacuum level) required for proton reduction at pH 7, [44] the electronic band structures of all Py-XTP-BT-COFs are well fitted for visible-light-driven hydrogen generation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.6 Å, 11 respectively ( Figure S5). [16][17][18] Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of SNP-BDT1 and SNP-BDT2 networks confirm a 'cauliflower'-like morphology typical for nucleation-growth polymers, while the SP-BTT polymer grows in rod-like aggregates of 20 to 100 μm length ( Figure S6-S8). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and selected-area electron-diffraction (SAED) for these three polymers confirm a similar degree of internal, microscopic structure as seen in PXRD data with visible, concentric rings indicative of polycrystalline materials ( Figure S9-S11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%