2023
DOI: 10.1080/03069885.2023.2174249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the future career autobiography with young Australian undergraduate students: autobiographical opportunities for career storytelling and narrative change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Purposive sampling was used and after obtaining ethical approval from the University Ethics Committee, the first six participants who contacted the research team were screened and recruited (three females and three males, aged between 18 and 20). This number of participants is appropriate for narrative case study research (Yin, 2014) and has been consistently used in career research that uses qualitative exploratory narrative design (see Abkhezr, 2023;Abkhezr et al, 2022;Jung & Heppner, 2015;Storlie et al, 2016;Taylor & Savickas, 2016). Inclusion criteria required participants to not have current full-time employment (to improve the chances that they might need some form of career support and to improve the relevance of participation) and be Australian permanent residents or citizens (to improve contextual consistency).…”
Section: Recruitment and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Purposive sampling was used and after obtaining ethical approval from the University Ethics Committee, the first six participants who contacted the research team were screened and recruited (three females and three males, aged between 18 and 20). This number of participants is appropriate for narrative case study research (Yin, 2014) and has been consistently used in career research that uses qualitative exploratory narrative design (see Abkhezr, 2023;Abkhezr et al, 2022;Jung & Heppner, 2015;Storlie et al, 2016;Taylor & Savickas, 2016). Inclusion criteria required participants to not have current full-time employment (to improve the chances that they might need some form of career support and to improve the relevance of participation) and be Australian permanent residents or citizens (to improve contextual consistency).…”
Section: Recruitment and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%