2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.4.074606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the formation of intrinsic p -type and n -type defects in CuO

Abstract: CuO (cupric oxide) is a well-known p-type semiconductor, suitable for solar cell photovoltaic applications. However, due to the easy formation of defects and Cu-rich layers at the copper(II) oxide heterointerface, commercial application is yet to be successfully implemented. Density functional theory calculations have been employed to study the formation of intrinsic defects and their effect on the electronic properties of CuO. Native impurities were observed, depending on the synthesis conditions, to render t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This limitation arises, in part, because electronic doping of TMOs typically occurs via intrinsic lattice defects and compositional nonstoichiometry. Depending on the formation energies of the various structural defects within the crystal lattice (i.e., vacancies and interstitials of either the metal cation or oxygen), any given oxide composition will show a marked preference for either n- or p-type doping. Late-first-row TMOs such as cobalt, nickel, and copper oxide exhibit low formation energies and good stabilities for metal cation vacancies (V M ), and the substoichiometric forms of these oxides, M 1– x O, are p-type semiconductors (Scheme a). In contrast, oxides such as TiO 2 and ZnO readily form oxygen vacancies (V O ) and show n-type conductivity when substoichiometric in oxygen (Scheme b). In both cases, it is difficult to form mobile carriers of opposite polarity because the relevant structural defect is either energetically inaccessible or highly unstable. It is critical, therefore, to understand the structural factors that dictate the defect formation energy and stability in TMOs in order to achieve ambipolar doping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limitation arises, in part, because electronic doping of TMOs typically occurs via intrinsic lattice defects and compositional nonstoichiometry. Depending on the formation energies of the various structural defects within the crystal lattice (i.e., vacancies and interstitials of either the metal cation or oxygen), any given oxide composition will show a marked preference for either n- or p-type doping. Late-first-row TMOs such as cobalt, nickel, and copper oxide exhibit low formation energies and good stabilities for metal cation vacancies (V M ), and the substoichiometric forms of these oxides, M 1– x O, are p-type semiconductors (Scheme a). In contrast, oxides such as TiO 2 and ZnO readily form oxygen vacancies (V O ) and show n-type conductivity when substoichiometric in oxygen (Scheme b). In both cases, it is difficult to form mobile carriers of opposite polarity because the relevant structural defect is either energetically inaccessible or highly unstable. It is critical, therefore, to understand the structural factors that dictate the defect formation energy and stability in TMOs in order to achieve ambipolar doping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A chain breakage leads to two new chains formation and an oxygen pseudovacancy at the end of one of them, which captures free oxygen ion; the connection of any two chains is followed by the release of a terminal oxygen ion that is captured by the nearest pseudovacancy, etc. Copper oxide electronic conduction mechanisms are comprehensively described in the literature 31–33 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copper oxide electronic conduction mechanisms are comprehensively described in the literature. [31][32][33]…”
Section: Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its electronic and structural properties have been studied intensively because of the high-temperature superconductivity discovery described comprehensively in the literature. [52][53][54][55][56][57] Oxygen permeation flux j 0 O 2 through the membrane shell can be limited by both chemical diffusion and surface exchange. When the thickness (L s ) of the membrane shell L s 4 L ch (L ch is the characteristic thickness defining the shell thickness that corresponds to the transition from chemical diffusion limitation to the state when the rate of oxygen permeation through the shell is controlled by the surface exchange 58 ), the oxygen flux is limited by chemical diffusion and given by the following equation: 31…”
Section: Oxygen Transport In Membrane Shellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its electronic and structural properties have been studied intensively because of the high-temperature superconductivity discovery described comprehensively in the literature. 52–57…”
Section: Oxygen Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%