Exploring the feasibility of web form adaptation to users’ cultural dimension scores

Abstract

With many daily tasks now performed on the Internet, productivity and efficiency in working with web pages have become transversal necessities for all users. Many of these tasks involve the inputting of user information, obligating the user to interact with a webform. Research has demonstrated that productivity depends largely on users' personal characteristics, implying that it will vary from user to user. The webform development process must therefore, include modeling of its intended users to ensure the interface design is appropriate. Taking all potential users into account is difficult, however, primarily because their identity is unknown, and some may be effectively excluded by the final design. Such discrimination can be avoided by incorporating rules that allow webforms to adapt automatically to the individual user's characteristics, the principal one being the person's culture. In this paper we report two studies that validate this option. We begin by determining the relationships between a user's cultural dimension scores and their behavior when faced with a webform. We then validate the notion that rules based on these relationships can be established for the automatic adaptation of a webform in order to reduce the time taken to complete it. We conclude that the automatic webform adaptation to the cultural dimensions of users improves their performance.

User-friendly locations of error messages in web forms: Put them on the right side of the erroneous input field

“…Topics like cultural adaptability (Recabarren and Nussbaum, 2010), date entry field formatting (Bargas-Avila et al, 2011a;Christian et al, 2007;Couper et al, 2004), error message timing (Bargas-Avila et al, 2007), field format restrictions (Bargas-Avila et al, 2011c), label alignment (Das et al, 2008), multiple option selection ( Bargas-Avila et al, 2011b), mandatory field highlighting (Pauwels et al, 2009;Tullis and Pons, 1997), question types (Reja et al, 2003) and response option formats (Healey, 2007;Heerwegh and Loosveldt, 2002) have been subject to empirical evaluation. While there is an increasing number of empirical studies in this field, the topic of where an error message is best placed within a web form was rarely explored.…”

Enhancing online forms: Use format specifications for fields with format restrictions to help respondents

“…It is quite common to use these abbreviations in Europe, a fact that probably helped users to understand the rule and apply the correct formatting. Indeed works show the importance of considering cultural factors when it comes to web form design (Recabarren et al, 2008;Recabarren and Nussbaum, 2010). The analysis on task level shows very clearly, that the difficulty of entering correct answers does not only depend on the information provided via format restriction labels, but also on the implied restriction on the data.…”

Ügyfélkapcsolati forma választásának egyes szempontjai elektronikus ügyintézésnél

“…Ugyanakkor 2011-ben kerekítve 8,5 millió 15 éven felüli állampolgár közül több mint 1,4 millió rendelkezett felsőfokú végzettséggel. 8 Az elmaradottak és a magasan képzettek száma is jelzi, hogy az egységes "ügyfél"-fogalomhoz rendelt egységes támogatási szint vagy egyik, vagy másik, vagy mindkét csoport számára kedvezőtlen. A 2010 után elkezdett egységes ügyfélszolgálati rendszer bevezetése (kormányablakok) az erősen lemaradók problémáját kezeli, ugyanakkor mind az ügyfél, mind a közigazgatás érdeke, hogy akinél csak lehet, a távoli kapcsolattartáson alapuló ügyintézés valósulhasson meg.…”