2017
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2017.1390621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the feasibility of unmanned aerial vehicles and thermal imaging for ungulate surveys in forests - preliminary results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
128
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
128
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The flight plan depends on the size of the area, atmospheric conditions on the day of the flight and flight characteristics of the UAV. The trajectory of the PW-ZOOM flight was programmed with HORIZON mp software (MicroPilot, Stony Mountain, Canada) (see also Witczuk et al 2017). To stitch a complete map together, the image overlapping (forward and side lap) ranged at least 60% between adjacent image frames.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flight plan depends on the size of the area, atmospheric conditions on the day of the flight and flight characteristics of the UAV. The trajectory of the PW-ZOOM flight was programmed with HORIZON mp software (MicroPilot, Stony Mountain, Canada) (see also Witczuk et al 2017). To stitch a complete map together, the image overlapping (forward and side lap) ranged at least 60% between adjacent image frames.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local community leaders later suggested flying the drones at sunrise, when dogs look for the first rays of sunlight to warm up from the cold night and therefore leave roofed or covered areas, being able to be spotted easily from an UAV. In the infrared spectrum, it is possible to detect thermal signatures of animals in medium, broken and sparse canopy [46]. Infrared thermal imagery is therefore implementable in more various settings than the visible spectrum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly called drones, they became a valuable tool in agricultural, environmental and wildlife monitoring [31]. Some studies used UAV to estimate population sizes of various animal species including sea birds [29,32], marine fauna [29,33], biungulates (red deer, roe deer, elk, wild boars, bison) [34], wolves [35] and marsupials [31]. Comparing to other counting methods, UAV’s advantage is the ability to count wildlife time efficiently in remote areas and in a standardized and reproducible way [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However they also find confusion with spurious warm sources (rocks etc) and the heat of the ground during the day (flights performed between 0700 and 1300 local time) making it difficult to distinguish animals from the ground. Witczuk et al (2017) survey populations of ungulates in forests using TIR. In this study they determine the best heights and time of day for flying the drone to get high signal-to-noise detections of the ungulates through trial and error.…”
Section: Broader Applications Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as yet there is no universally accepted approach for best practice in their use. Aerial surveys of populations of animals using TIR has been attempted by Burn et al (2009), Witczuk et al (2017) and Mulero-Pázmány et al (2014), however these groups report that analysing the large volume of data produced and counting and identifying animals by eye is a very time-consuming method of data analysis. Gooday et al (2018) also report several sources of confusion when it comes to reliably detecting and identifying animals with TIR, both drone-mounted and when handheld on the ground.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%