Exploring the Ethics of the Participant-Produced Archive: The Complexities of Dissemination

Burkholder, Casey; MacEntee, Katie

doi:10.1057/978-1-137-54305-9_16

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It can refer to the actual artefacts though with digitizing practices this may be less significant at least in relation to photos, cellphilms and collages. They also refer to seeking permissions and input about exhibitions and the negotiation of storage, something that Burkholder and MacEntee (2016) discuss in relation to ensuring that young people know they can remove their cellphilm or digital story when they wish. The common practice in research, and indeed typically the practices endorsed by Research Ethics Boards (REBs), is that researchers own the data, determining how and what will be stored, where and for how long.…”

Section: What’s Ownership Got To Do With It? Ownership In Youth-focus...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As Burkholder and MacEntee (2016) have noted, the shared storage site can become a site of negotiation and consent. Participants, for example, might change their minds about who should see their productions.…”

Section: What’s Ownership Got To Do With It? Ownership In Youth-focus...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…First, we have the example from Delgado (2015) who wrote ‘One recommendation is for adults to negotiate a renewable one-year agreement’ (p. 165), that would cover presentations and publishing. Then Burkholder and MacEntee (2016) as cited earlier have written extensively about youth participation in sharing ownership of online digital platforms, and especially the rights of young people to upload and remove material from a shared and dedicated archive. Another example is the recent work led by Indigenous girls and young women in the Networks for Change project in co-authoring with adult researchers.…”

Section: Conclusion and Implications For Further Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

On the Ethics of Getting the Word Out: Rural Girls Reflect on Ownership in Participatory Visual Research in Rural South Africa

Mitchell

Yamile

D'Amico

et al. 2023

YOUNG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite the growing body of literature dedicated to ethical and methodological issues related to youth engagement and youth participation in arts-based research, the ethics of ownership in relation to the production and sharing of visual artefacts remains an understudied area. This work is particularly critical in the context of war-affected youth, and youth addressing issues of gender-based violence in their lives. Drawing on the voices and perspectives of a group of girls and young women affected by sexual violence in rural South Africa, we explore their views on the idea of ownership of the visual productions (videos, photos, policy briefs) created in an arts-based research project. As we highlight in the article, ownership is a complex ethical issue, and one that cuts across a range of concerns including consent, rights and personal engagement.

show abstract

Section: What’s Ownership Got To Do With It? Ownership In Youth-focus...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: What’s Ownership Got To Do With It? Ownership In Youth-focus...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Conclusion and Implications For Further Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

On the Ethics of Getting the Word Out: Rural Girls Reflect on Ownership in Participatory Visual Research in Rural South Africa

Mitchell

Yamile

D'Amico

et al. 2023

YOUNG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Cellphones Beyond the Workshop: Youth Researchers Owning Gender Transformative Change Through Participatory Visual Research in Rural India During COVID-19

MacEntee,

Panda,

Lowthers

et al. 2024

Studies in Arts-Based Educational Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Participatory visual methods are a means for marginalized communities to engage in research for social change. However, the technology gap, especially for economically disadvantaged youth in the Global South, can exclude groups from sustained participation in project activities. This article explores the significance of providing 20 Youth Researchers (YRs) with cellphones that they could keep and the impact of this cellphone ownership on research activities during COVID-19. The YRs learned how to use cellphones for cellphilm and photovoice methods to research gender-based violence (GBV) and sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in Odisha, India. Beyond the workshop, when YRs returned to their rural communities, they navigated multiple waves of COVID-19. Being sensitized to issues of gender equality and social justice, they used their cellphones to draw attention to issues of GBV and SRHR, public health, social justice, and equality. The ‘beyond the workshop’ outputs were indicative of the intersectional impacts of youth in their rural contexts during this unprecedented time and demonstrate how acquiring cellphones can promote youth ownership of project activities, personal transformation for YRs and youth-led advocacy.

show abstract

Reflexively Revisiting Three Participatory Cellphilm Archives

Burkholder

2024

Studies in Arts-Based Educational Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Exploring the Ethics of the Participant-Produced Archive: The Complexities of Dissemination

Cited by 5 publications

References 13 publications

On the Ethics of Getting the Word Out: Rural Girls Reflect on Ownership in Participatory Visual Research in Rural South Africa

On the Ethics of Getting the Word Out: Rural Girls Reflect on Ownership in Participatory Visual Research in Rural South Africa

Cellphones Beyond the Workshop: Youth Researchers Owning Gender Transformative Change Through Participatory Visual Research in Rural India During COVID-19

Reflexively Revisiting Three Participatory Cellphilm Archives

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About