2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-020-02417-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Equity and Spatial Evidence of Educational Facilities in Hangzhou, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies have shown that first, the rapid growth of the urban population and the greatly increased need for land use for urban construction have created a demand for infrastructure that far exceeds the service capacity of the existing service facilities [17,18]. The lack of space in the urban center and the shortage of educational facilities in the suburbs often leads to the uneven distribution of schools in the core and peripheral areas of a city [19], thus exacerbating the inequities in educational resource distribution. Liu et al [20] used quantitative methods, such as spatial interpolation and cluster analysis, based on resource data such as elementary school building conditions, faculty, and the total amount of educational resources in Dalian City, and found that its elementary school resources exhibited a "center edge" circled layout; that is, the central urban areas were dominated by high-level secondary schools while the peripheral county cities were dominated by elementary schools, exhibiting a circled "decay" pattern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have shown that first, the rapid growth of the urban population and the greatly increased need for land use for urban construction have created a demand for infrastructure that far exceeds the service capacity of the existing service facilities [17,18]. The lack of space in the urban center and the shortage of educational facilities in the suburbs often leads to the uneven distribution of schools in the core and peripheral areas of a city [19], thus exacerbating the inequities in educational resource distribution. Liu et al [20] used quantitative methods, such as spatial interpolation and cluster analysis, based on resource data such as elementary school building conditions, faculty, and the total amount of educational resources in Dalian City, and found that its elementary school resources exhibited a "center edge" circled layout; that is, the central urban areas were dominated by high-level secondary schools while the peripheral county cities were dominated by elementary schools, exhibiting a circled "decay" pattern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in view of spatial characteristics of educational resources, researchers conduct a series of studies based on GIS technology [12][13][14][15][16]. Zhang [12] constructsequilibrium analysis indicators for basic education based on educational opportunities, resource allocation, and educational quality and derives school distance and accessibility through GIS overlay analysis and network analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RG Taylor et al [13]adopt GIS spatial analysis technology to study school distribution and layout adjustment plan in Johnston County, North Carolina. Wu et al [14]study distribution and spatial pattern of educational facilities in Hangzhou, and evaluate fairness of educational resources. Guo et al investigates distribution characteristics and layout efficiency of educational resources in towns/streets, finding significant spatial distribution clustering characteristics [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, high density information and material flow continue to gather in the central area of a city, connected to the surrounding decentralized structure through urban facilities 3 , 29 . Given the massive migration of rural population to urban areas, built-up areas continue to expand to the suburbs 30 , resulting in an aggravation of the living gap between urban and rural residents 15 , 27 , 31 . When dividing the urban–rural boundary, the majority of related studies have adopted the density grade of impervious layer, the boundary of night lights, the concentration area of population density or administrative boundary of a city to explore the facility pattern, service distribution 2 , 11 , and landscape pattern on the urban–rural gradient 2 , 30 , 32 , 33 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, urban residents have different demand preferences for supporting facilities at different levels or sizes 19 , either focusing on distance factors (e.g., clinics and pharmacies) or preferring service quality 39 , 40 (e.g., hospitals). However, in the current research on the equality of education or medical facilities, more people tend to quantitatively evaluate the spatial differences of inequality of a certain type of facilities 15 , 22 , often disregarding the fact that even facilities with similar functions have differences between different levels or types of facilities 4 , 19 . In addition, urban sustainability is multidimensional and multi-scale in nature, and solutions focusing on one spatial scale or dimension may not produce the same effect on different spatial scales or dimensions 20 , 41 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%