2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the environmental impact of crop production in China using a comprehensive footprint approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The North China Plain, where this study is located, is the region where the soil pH is alkaline, which just confirms the result that pig manure can reduce soil N 2 O in this study. Ammonia volatilization is the main contributor of reactive nitrogen in farmland, which is consistent with the conclusion of Li et al [ 43 ]. In this study, the application of pig manure can reduce soil ammonia volatilization by 16.2%, which is consistent with previous studies [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The North China Plain, where this study is located, is the region where the soil pH is alkaline, which just confirms the result that pig manure can reduce soil N 2 O in this study. Ammonia volatilization is the main contributor of reactive nitrogen in farmland, which is consistent with the conclusion of Li et al [ 43 ]. In this study, the application of pig manure can reduce soil ammonia volatilization by 16.2%, which is consistent with previous studies [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In order to analyze the explanatory power and interaction of different influencing factors on the spatial-temporal variation of the AWF grey in the Yellow River Basin, and considering the scientificity and comprehensiveness of the selection of indicators as well as the comparability and availability of data combined with the relevant literature [63][64][65][66], 12 influencing factors were selected. These 12 factors included: population scale, X 1 ; economic scale, X 2 ; urban and rural structure, X 3 ; technological innovation, X 4 ; industrial structure, X 5 ; resource endowment, X 6 ; crop yield, X 7 ; planting structure, X 8 ; proportion of agricultural water use, X 9 ; fertilizer application intensity, X 10 ; pesticide application intensity, X 11 ; and agricultural film application intensity, X 12 .…”
Section: Path Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there exists a notable paucity of research focusing on the historical changes in CF of rice production due to the lack of long-term spatial explicit data on emitting sources from various processes, particularly the direct emissions from paddy ecosystems. 14,15 Consequently, the assessment of CF for rice production at both finer spatial (i.e., county scale) and temporal scales is urgently needed for accurately analyzing the spatiotemporal pattern, disclosing the potential driving factors, and facilitating the formulation of localized mitigation policies. Throughout the entire process of rice production, the direct methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions from paddy fields contributed to over 70% of CF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%