Protein and Peptide Folding, Misfolding, and Non‐Folding 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118183373.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Energy Landscape of Small Peptides and Proteins by Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While a suitable representation of the energy landscape should (at least) reproduce the correct number, energy, and location of the metastable states and barriers, these basic quantities often get lost when the energy landscape is projected on a low-dimensional subspace. 21,22 As a solution of this problem, we have recently suggested to use a combination of systematic dimensionality reduction methods [23][24][25][26][27][28][29] (that identify in a controlled manner adequate system degrees of freedom) and a multidimensional dLE 16,30,31 (that accounts for dimensionality of the collective coordinate). The resulting dLE model is able to quantitatively reproduce dynamical observables (such as time correlation functions and first passage times) that can be directly compared to the original MD data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a suitable representation of the energy landscape should (at least) reproduce the correct number, energy, and location of the metastable states and barriers, these basic quantities often get lost when the energy landscape is projected on a low-dimensional subspace. 21,22 As a solution of this problem, we have recently suggested to use a combination of systematic dimensionality reduction methods [23][24][25][26][27][28][29] (that identify in a controlled manner adequate system degrees of freedom) and a multidimensional dLE 16,30,31 (that accounts for dimensionality of the collective coordinate). The resulting dLE model is able to quantitatively reproduce dynamical observables (such as time correlation functions and first passage times) that can be directly compared to the original MD data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding this, the application of PCA to biological structural data, also known as essential dynamics analysis (EDA), has been used to identify collective, large‐scale modes of protein motion. The insights gained from these analyses have been coherent with data from other analytical techniques, and have thus contributed to the elucidation of the functional mechanics of the studied proteins …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The insights gained from these analyses have been coherent with data from other analytical techniques, and have thus contributed to the elucidation of the functional mechanics of the studied proteins. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Classically, in PCA of protein structural data, the variances in the Cartesian coordinates of a macromolecular system are analyzed (hereafter referred to as cPCA). 21-23 Other bases of data, such as the fluctuations of the dihedral angles of the protein backbone may also be transformed with PCA.…”
Section: Theoretical Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…C3-293 and C3-363 have one and two conformational regions, respectively. At the same time, we compare their metastable conformational states (Stock, Jain, & Riccardi, 2012) in the conformational regions with the crystal structure. A few differences are found in the regions such as residues 1-10 of C3-293, residues 1-18 of C3-363, but most of residues and overall structure have no obvious differences.…”
Section: Conformational Changes Under Different Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%