2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11367-021-01972-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the effectiveness of grey literature indicators and life cycle assessment in assessing circular economy at the micro level: a comparative analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Otherwise, well‐intended CE strategies might actually lead to unintended sustainability impacts and burden shifting (Blum et al, 2020; Corona et al, 2019). Indeed, Roos Lindgreen et al (2021) have found that applying resource‐focused CE metrics in isolation can lead to contradicting results when compared to impacts calculated through life cycle assessments (LCAs). Different terms for managing units of information are used in academic literature on sustainability or CE assessment, such as metric, variable, indicator, methodology or index (Saidani et al, 2019; Sala et al, 2013; Veleva & Ellenbecker, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, well‐intended CE strategies might actually lead to unintended sustainability impacts and burden shifting (Blum et al, 2020; Corona et al, 2019). Indeed, Roos Lindgreen et al (2021) have found that applying resource‐focused CE metrics in isolation can lead to contradicting results when compared to impacts calculated through life cycle assessments (LCAs). Different terms for managing units of information are used in academic literature on sustainability or CE assessment, such as metric, variable, indicator, methodology or index (Saidani et al, 2019; Sala et al, 2013; Veleva & Ellenbecker, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, whilst a company might have a favourable CTI score overall, the environmental impact of it could still be less promising, depending on how and what kinds of materials are being circulated. Roos Lindgreen et al (2021) have shown in their paper, that the results of LCAs and circularity indicators (amongst others the CTI), do not necessarily point into the same directions. Hence, whilst the mass of the materials and products as well as the R‐strategies are relevant for conducting LCAs and applying the CTI, the additional step of evaluating the potential sustainability impacts of the new strategy should be an integral part of the assessment process (Das et al, 2022; Roos Lindgreen et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Regionalising food waste treatment scenarios is also fundamental for defining specific circular economy (CE) strategies at the local level. As pointed out by Roos Lindgreen et al (2021), LCA may be considered a suitable method for measuring circularity and its related environmental consequences. In this context, a dedicated and specific LCI for the end of life is needed in order to support the transition of local businesses towards CE.…”
Section: End Of Life and Circular Economy Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although LCA may help to solve the trade-offs among various ways to close (or open) the resource loops, the modelling of a dedicated LCI for the end-of-life phase does not allow taking into consideration the differences in terms of quality and physical properties between primary and secondary products (i.e. downgrading) (Roos Lindgreen et al 2021;Niero and Olsen 2016). This may lead to partial results that could highlight a potential environmental benefit without considering the lost quality value of the secondary product.…”
Section: End Of Life and Circular Economy Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%