2019
DOI: 10.21203/rs.2.9615/v2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the druggable space around the Fanconi anemia pathway using machine learning and mechanistic models

Abstract: Background In spite of the abundance of genomic data, predictive models that describe phenotypes as a function of gene expression or mutations are difficult to obtain because they are affected by the curse of dimensionality, given the disbalance between samples and candidate genes. And this is especially dramatic in scenarios in which the availability of samples is difficult, such as the case of rare diseases. Results The application of multi-output regression machine learning methodologies to predict the p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The paper uses the METABRIC breast cancer as a proof of concept and allows to see promising directions to build patient models with mechanistic insights. Esteban-Medina et al, [8] used public gene expression data and a list of genes that are the target of approved drugs to identify potential causal relationships between proteins and cell activities. They rely on a Multi-Output Random Forest regressor available in scikit-learn and an optimization strategy built on top to predict a circuit activity across the disease pathway.…”
Section: Trend 1: Approaches Based On Machine-learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The paper uses the METABRIC breast cancer as a proof of concept and allows to see promising directions to build patient models with mechanistic insights. Esteban-Medina et al, [8] used public gene expression data and a list of genes that are the target of approved drugs to identify potential causal relationships between proteins and cell activities. They rely on a Multi-Output Random Forest regressor available in scikit-learn and an optimization strategy built on top to predict a circuit activity across the disease pathway.…”
Section: Trend 1: Approaches Based On Machine-learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esteban-Medina et al,. [8] used a machine learning approach, combined with data from KEGG, Orphanet, GEO, GTEx and DrugBank to identify drugs that could have an effect on signaling the circuits that cause the treatment of the Fanconi anemia. Selected in the top-4 papers, Chen et al, [6] used a neural network to predict drug resistance to antibiotics in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.…”
Section: Trend 3: Drug Repositioning and Large-scale Prediction Of Drmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this opens the possibility of using these models for exploring new therapeutic options as well (22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a proper interpretation of the effect that differences in gene expression have over phenotypes, such as drug response or disease progression, involves understanding the mechanisms of the disease or the mode of action of drugs, which can be interpreted through mechanistic models of cell signaling [ 12 ] or cell metabolism [ 13 ]. Mechanistic models have helped to understand the disease mechanisms behind different cancers [ 14 , 15 ], including neuroblastoma [ 16 , 17 ], breast cancer [ 18 ], rare diseases [ 19 ], complex diseases [ 20 ], the mechanisms of action of drugs [ 21 , 22 ], and other biologically interesting scenarios such as the molecular mechanisms that explain how stress-induced activation of brown adipose tissue prevents obesity [ 23 ] or the molecular mechanisms of death and the post-mortem ischemia of a tissue [ 24 ]. Among the few available proposals of mechanistic modeling algorithms that model different aspects of signaling pathway activity, Hipathia has demonstrated having superior sensitivity and specificity [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%