2019
DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Differences Between Early and Traditional Diet Advancement in Postoperative Feeding Outcomes in Patients With an Ileostomy or Colostomy

Abstract: Background:We assessed the differences in postoperative feeding outcomes when comparing early and traditional diet advancement in patients who had an ostomy creation. Methods: At a U.S. tertiary care hospital, data from patients who underwent an ileostomy or colostomy creation from June 1, 2013, to April 30, 2017 were extracted from an institutional database. Patients who received early diet advancement (postoperative days 0 and 1) were compared with traditional diet advancement (postoperative day 2 and later)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(28) The need for ongoing vasopressor support is not an absolute contraindication to the initiation of EN or an indication for PN. (discussed below in Section C) There are relatively fewer contraindications to EN than historically believed and we advocate for a trial of EN in most patients including those with an open abdomen after damage control laparotomy (17,29,30), newly created ostomy (31), those who require prone positioning (32)(33)(34) neuromuscular blockade infusions (34,35), and in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) (36, 37). Previous studies have not only shown EN to be safe, but even advantageous for these patients.…”
Section: B Decision For Enteral Versus Parenteral Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(28) The need for ongoing vasopressor support is not an absolute contraindication to the initiation of EN or an indication for PN. (discussed below in Section C) There are relatively fewer contraindications to EN than historically believed and we advocate for a trial of EN in most patients including those with an open abdomen after damage control laparotomy (17,29,30), newly created ostomy (31), those who require prone positioning (32)(33)(34) neuromuscular blockade infusions (34,35), and in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) (36, 37). Previous studies have not only shown EN to be safe, but even advantageous for these patients.…”
Section: B Decision For Enteral Versus Parenteral Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis [ 30 ] evaluating the effect on the early time of oral feeding after upper gastrointestinal surgery found that early postoperative oral feeding reduced the length of hospital stay and decreased relevant complications as anastomotic leak and incidence of nasogastric tube reinsertion. Toledano et al [ 31 ] showed that early oral feeding reduced the time to first flatus and first ostomy output compared with traditional diet in the patients who had an ostomy creation, which may promote the recovery of bowel function. In our study, time to first postoperative feeding was an independent risk factor of early postoperative bowel obstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis[28] evaluating the effect on the early time of oral feeding after upper gastrointestinal surgery found that early postoperative oral feeding reduced the length of hospital stay and decreased relevant complications as anastomotic leak and incidence of nasogastric tube reinsertion. Sabrina Toledano et al [29] showed that early oral feeding reduced the time to rst atus and rst ostomy output compared with traditional diet in the patients who had an ostomy creation, which may promote the recovery of bowel function. In our study, time to rst postoperative feeding was an independent risk factor of early postoperative bowel obstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%