2021
DOI: 10.1002/hpja.546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the design and introduction of the Ophelia (Optimising Health Literacy and Access) process in the Philippines: A qualitative case study

Abstract: Despite recent economic development, 1 the Philippines continues to experience health and income inequalities. Sixteen per cent of Filipinos still live below the poverty line, 2 those in the lowest-income quartile experience a higher incidence of diseases and shorter life expectancy than more affluent groups, 3 and remote communities have poorer utilisation of health services than urban populations. 4 The Philippines also faces an increasing burden from noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), which account for 68% of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…synthesized findings through reflexive discussion into common concepts [44,45]. The use of multiple researchers throughout this reflexive process is common in other projects adopting the Ophelia framework [46][47][48][49]. In line with the Ophelia framework [38,39] and the aims of the study, analysis of the insight is focused on the development of useful knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…synthesized findings through reflexive discussion into common concepts [44,45]. The use of multiple researchers throughout this reflexive process is common in other projects adopting the Ophelia framework [46][47][48][49]. In line with the Ophelia framework [38,39] and the aims of the study, analysis of the insight is focused on the development of useful knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ophelia (Optimizing Health Literacy and Access) process engages community members to help identify and respond to their health literacy strengths and needs. The Ophelia process was developed in Australia (29) and further tested and refined in different contexts and several countries (2,33,(47)(48)(49)(50)(51). It has three phases (Figure 1): Phase 1: needs assessment; Phase 2: co-design and testing of health literacy actions; Phase 3: implementation, evaluation and continuous quality improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ophelia process is a way to develop health literacy interventions grounded on the needs of a community, relying heavily on the collaboration of multiple stakeholders and community members to “improve health and equity by increasing the availability and accessibility of health information and services in locally‐appropriate ways.” 3 The study aims to evaluate its practicality as a Health Promotion Tool for the Philippines with emphasis on collaboration, taking into account the local context and community wisdom. In 2017, the Ophelia process was implemented for the first time in chosen communities in the Philippines through this study, enabling the different stakeholders from the Department of Health (DOH), local government units (LGUs), health practitioners, and community members to work together by cocreating and implementing evidence‐based interventions for better health outcomes 4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2017, the Ophelia process was implemented for the first time in chosen communities in the Philippines through this study, enabling the different stakeholders from the Department of Health (DOH), local government units (LGUs), health practitioners, and community members to work together by cocreating and implementing evidence-based interventions for better health outcomes. 4 Needs assessment was done using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) and the Information and Support for Health Actions Questionnaire (ISHAQ). The HLQ and the ISHAQ are multidimensional surveys that provide practitioners, organisations and governments the health literacy strengths and limitations of individuals and populations in their areas with the latter more appropriate for LMICs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%