Exploring the consequences of decentralization: has privatization of health services been the perceived effect of decentralization in Khartoum locality, Sudan?

Abstract

Background: The health system of Sudan has experienced several forms of decentralization, as well as, a radical reform. Authority and governance of secondary and tertiary health facilities have been shifted from federal to state levels. Moreover, the provision of health care services have been moved from large federal tertiary level hospitals such as Khartoum Teaching Hospital (KTH) and Jafaar Ibnoaf Hospital (JIH), located in the center of Khartoum, to smaller district secondary hospitals like Ibrahim Malik (IBMH), which is located in the southern part of Khartoum. Exploring stakeholders' perceptions on this decentralisation implementation and its relevant consequences is vital in building an empirical benchmark for the improvement of health systems. Methods: This study utilised a qualitative design which is comprised of in-depth interviews and qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach. The study was conducted between July and December 2015, and aimed at understanding the personal experiences and perceptions of stakeholders towards decentralisation enforcement and the implications on public health services, with a particular focus on the Khartoum locality. It involved community members residing in the Khartoum Locality, specifically in catchments area where hospital decentralisation was implemented, as well as, affiliated health workers and policymakers. Results: The major finding suggested that privatisation of health services occurred after decentralisation. The study participants also highlighted that scrutiny and reduction of budgets allocated to health services led to an instantaneous enforcement of cost recovery user fee. Devolving KTH Khartoum Teaching and Jafar Ibnoaf Hospitals into peripherals with less. Capacity, was considered to be a plan to weaken public health services and outsource services to private sector. Another theme that was highlighted in hospitals included the profit-making aspect of the governmental sector in the form of drug supplying and profit-making retail.

Accessibility crisis of essential medicines at Sudanese primary healthcare facilities: a cross-sectional drugs’ dispensaries assessment and patients’ perspectives

“…Finally, this study was limited to the public dispensaries of Khartoum state, which supplies the bulk of Sudan’s health services, and contains 25% of PHC facilities [ 43 ], due to the unfortunate centralized distribution. On the other hand, rural regions are home to 66.8% of the Sudanese population [ 44 ].…”

The Needs of Patients With Chronic Disease in Transitional Care From Hospital to Home in Sudan: A Qualitative Study

“…Localities are responsible for delivering primary health care services and aggregating health services by facilities in their districts. 32 …”

Re-opening Sudan: the Balance Between Maintaining Daily Living and Avoiding the Next Peak of COVID-19

“…A study of healthcare expenditure and outcomes has shown that healthcare expenditure was positively associated with life expectancy and negatively associated with neonatal, infant, and under five death [ 15 ]. A major move towards decentralization and privatization of the health system during the dictatorship made access to quality healthcare very difficult and created a barrier to any development efforts in the country [ 16 , 17 ]. Significant decreases in expenditure on the public health system by the dictatorship deprived poor people from access to health services because they could not afford the cost of private health services.…”