Exploring the concept of non-violent resistance amongst healthcare workers

Abstract

Background Non-violent resistance which has involved healthcare workers has been instrumental in securing a number of health-related gains and a force in opposing threats to health. Despite this, we know little about healthcare workers who have engaged in acts of non-violent resistance. Research aim Amongst a sample of healthcare workers who had engaged in acts of resistance this study sought to explore their understanding of non-violent resistance and how or whether they felt healthcare workers made a distinct contribution to such action. Research design Cross-sectional survey Participants and research context Healthcare workers (doctors, nurses, academics and others) from the UK and Europe who had engaged in acts of non-violent resistance. Ethical considerations Ethical approval for this study was granted by the University of Greenwich Human Research Ethics Committee (UREC/20.5.6.11). Findings/results Most participants spoke about the nature of non-violent resistance, its oppositional, didactic and symbolic functions and the role of violence or harm. While most people understood non-violent resistance as a public, oppositional and collective act, many identified more subtle everyday acts in the workplace that undermined policy or procedures they saw as harmful. When asked about distinctions in non-violent resistance carried out by healthcare workers, most participants referred to their standing in society, noting that healthcare works were a trusted and authoritative source. Some identified an ethical imperative to act while others identified the risks that came with such action, noting their accountability and responsibility they had to patients. About a quarter of participants felt that such action was no different to others carrying out non-violent resistance or dependent on the issue or nature of the action. Conclusions These findings speak to the complex and multifaceted nature of non-violent resistance. Additionally our findings suggest healthcare workers have a distinct role to play in leading and supporting non-violent actions.

Patient care in complex Sociotechnological ecosystems and learning health systems

“…Traditional command‐and‐control leadership has shown less effectiveness than diverse team leadership that is supported by their respective organizations. Furthermore, hierarchical leadership structures limit the ability of “lower ranking” team members to voice opinions, make implementing change and innovation difficult, and contribute to gender and ethnic inequalities and discriminatory practices 99 . Diverse team leadership groups have demonstrated to be a characteristic of high‐performing teams, 100 with greater success in innovation and outcomes 101 .…”

Everyday Resistance in the U.K.’s National Health Service

“…al. 2022 ). Participants were originally recruited through the Medact ( https://www.medact.org/ ) member database.…”

Strategies for a Nonviolent Response to Perpetrator Actions: What Can Christianity Offer to Targets of Workplace Mobbing?

“…However, isn't a prayer and a Christian response to workplace mobbing a passive, losing strategy? Indeed, nonviolent resistance is not a new topic, but according to Ryan Essex et al (2023), such a response remains a disputed concept in regard to the forms and consequences of such resistance. Although nonviolent individual responses to violence are most often examined in the context of collective resistance (Dahlum et al 2022;Essex et al 2023;Vollhardt et al 2020), it is important to understand the motives that drive people to adopt these strategies.…”

“…Indeed, nonviolent resistance is not a new topic, but according to Ryan Essex et al (2023), such a response remains a disputed concept in regard to the forms and consequences of such resistance. Although nonviolent individual responses to violence are most often examined in the context of collective resistance (Dahlum et al 2022;Essex et al 2023;Vollhardt et al 2020), it is important to understand the motives that drive people to adopt these strategies. For example, a study conducted by Ryan Essex et al ( 2023) demonstrated that 12.9% of physicians surveyed mentioned conscience, ethical, moral beliefs or principles.…”