2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the clinical outcomes after deep brain stimulation in Tourette syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparable clinical results have been reported in up to four different targets within the CM thalamic region [12], however anatomical differences between these nuclei should be taken into consideration. A recent study with a similar setting, in this case targeting the CM-Pf (parafascicular) region, showed a high variability between the clinical outcome and the connectivity [38]. In this report, the cortical projections associated with better clinical responses were the right frontal middle gyrus, the left frontal superior sulci region and the left cingulate sulci region.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Comparable clinical results have been reported in up to four different targets within the CM thalamic region [12], however anatomical differences between these nuclei should be taken into consideration. A recent study with a similar setting, in this case targeting the CM-Pf (parafascicular) region, showed a high variability between the clinical outcome and the connectivity [38]. In this report, the cortical projections associated with better clinical responses were the right frontal middle gyrus, the left frontal superior sulci region and the left cingulate sulci region.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…A common target for deep brain stimulation in Tourette patients is the thalamic centromedian-parafascicular (CM-Pf) region (Mink, 2006; Britoa et al, 2019). According to our approach, the thalamus is a critical element of the shortcut, and indeed Tourette patients had increased basal ganglia-cortical and thalamo-cortical connectivity in a recent fMRI study (Ramkiran et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional profile was defined in terms of connection between the volumes of tissue activated (VTAs) of the active DBS contact and the cortical areas. The results showed that responders had VTAs that were closely linked to the right frontal middle gyrus, the left frontal superior sulci region, and the left cingulate sulci region, whereas poor responders had VTAs that were only loosely related to these regions [94]. Although this study was limited by small sample size (n = 5 patients), the results indicate that the assessment of VTA-based functional connectivity profiles could help in predicting the patient's clinical response to CM-Pf DBS.…”
Section: Functional Connectivity Profilesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In another study, the functional connectivity profile of TS patients who showed a good clinical response to CM-Pf DBS were compared with that of patients who displayed a poor clinical response [94]. The functional profile was defined in terms of connection between the volumes of tissue activated (VTAs) of the active DBS contact and the cortical areas.…”
Section: Functional Connectivity Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%