2024
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1263714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the causal relationship between inflammatory cytokines and immunoinflammatory dermatoses: a Mendelian randomization study

Jiaxuan Li,
Yining Lu,
Xuelian Zhao

Abstract: ObjectivesPrevious studies have shown that the onset and progression of several immunoinflammatory dermatoses are closely related to specific immune-inflammatory responses. To further assess the causal relationship between 41 inflammatory cytokines and immunoinflammatory dermatoses, we used a Mendelian randomization method.MethodsMendelian two-sample randomization utilized inflammatory cytokines from a GWAS abstract containing 8,293 healthy participants as well as psoriasis (4,510 cases and 212,242 controls), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 65 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until now, several studies have explored the casual effects of circulating cytokines and skin diseases utilizing MR. Li et al. investigated the causal relationship between inflammatory cytokines and three immunoinflammatory dermatoses, and revealed inhibitory roles of IL-4 and IL-1RA in the risk of developing AD ( 28 ). The findings of this study diverge from ours, potentially attributable to variations in GWAS selections and dissimilarities in study designs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, several studies have explored the casual effects of circulating cytokines and skin diseases utilizing MR. Li et al. investigated the causal relationship between inflammatory cytokines and three immunoinflammatory dermatoses, and revealed inhibitory roles of IL-4 and IL-1RA in the risk of developing AD ( 28 ). The findings of this study diverge from ours, potentially attributable to variations in GWAS selections and dissimilarities in study designs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%