2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9a3c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Carbon Simmering Phase: Reaction Rates, Mixing, and the Convective Urca Process

Abstract: The neutron excess at the time of explosion provides a powerful discriminant among models of Type Ia supernovae. Recent calculations of the carbon simmering phase in single degenerate progenitors have disagreed about the final neutron excess. We find that the treatment of mixing in convection zones likely contributes to the difference. We demonstrate that in MESA models, heating from exothermic weak reactions plays a significant role in raising the temperature of the WD. This emphasizes the important role that… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with previous works [40][41][42][43][44] we obtain that electron captures and URCA pairs imply a net cooling of the inner region, C-ignition occurs at higher densities and both, the explosion density and the neutronization levels, are higher as compared with models that do not include URCA reactions.…”
Section: Models Results and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In agreement with previous works [40][41][42][43][44] we obtain that electron captures and URCA pairs imply a net cooling of the inner region, C-ignition occurs at higher densities and both, the explosion density and the neutronization levels, are higher as compared with models that do not include URCA reactions.…”
Section: Models Results and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The collapse-explosion puzzle of ECSNe cannot be solved solely from the theoretical side, due to the subtleties involved in simulations, such as the weak-reaction rates (Suzuki et al 2019;Strömberg et al 2021;Langanke et al 2021), convective URCA process (Paczyński 1973;Denissenkov et al 2015;Schwab et al 2017), convective mixing process driven by oxygen burning (Nomoto 1987;Zha et al 2019;Takahashi et al 2019), and physics of the oxygen flame (Leung et al 2020;Schwab et al 2020). Each scenario, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(see also Kushnir et al 2020), where we have used the solar Fe abundance X(Fe) = 1.292 × 10 In M Ch models this baseline Y e can in principle be reduced via weak reactions on carbon during the convective burning (or "simmering") phase prior to thermonuclear runaway (e.g., Piro & Bildsten 2008;Chamulak et al 2008;Schwab et al 2017), although Martínez-Rodríguez et al (2016) show the impact to be negligible (reduction in Y e of 10 −4 only; but see Piersanti et al 2017 for a different view). However, the higher densities of M Ch WDs (up to 2−3 × 10 9 g cm −3 ; see Fig.…”
Section: Nuclear Statistical Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%