2003
DOI: 10.1080/0269920031000080019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the boundaries of SLI: findings from morphosyntactic and story grammar analyses

Abstract: The nature of morphosyntactic and story-grammar differences were examined between children with SLI and children with language impairments that fell outside the diagnostic category for SLI solely because of their low non-verbal cognitive abilities (LNVA). Two oral narratives were elicited from 5-year-old children with language impairments and age-matched children with normally developing language. Morphosyntactic difficulties were found to be similar for children with SLI and children with LNVA. The children w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Children with SLI and NLI were shown to have similar morphosyntactic language characteristics in several studies (Pearce, McCormack, and James, 2003;Fey et al, 2004;Rice, et al, 2004) . Both diagnostic groups had more errors in the verb phrase than the noun phrase and significant difficulties with finite tense forms.…”
Section: Comparisons Between Sli and Nlimentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Children with SLI and NLI were shown to have similar morphosyntactic language characteristics in several studies (Pearce, McCormack, and James, 2003;Fey et al, 2004;Rice, et al, 2004) . Both diagnostic groups had more errors in the verb phrase than the noun phrase and significant difficulties with finite tense forms.…”
Section: Comparisons Between Sli and Nlimentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Two studies compared the oral narratives of children with SLI and NLI (Fey et al, 2004;Pearce et al, 2003) . A small study by Pearce et al found that young children with SLI told more complex stories than children with NLI who were matched for MLU.…”
Section: Comparisons Between Sli and Nlimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Mayer 1969). Frequently used in this capacity (e.g., Botting 2002;Bordreau and Hedberg 1999;Eriksson 2001;Greenhalgh and Strong 2001;Miles and Chapman 2002;Norbury and Bishop 2003;Pearce et al 2003;Restrepo 1998), the picture book is well-suited for collecting narrative samples as it illustrates a typical story sequence (i.e., initiating event, plan, goal attempts, and consequences) and traditional story components (e.g., characters, setting). Using a standardized protocol through which to elicit narratives, trained examiners helped each child preview the book and then asked him or her to tell a make-believe story.…”
Section: Child Language Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This appears to be more likely when the elicitation materials provide less support (e.g., single picture vs. picture sequence), the children in the language-impaired group have more severe deficits, and the control group is age-matched (see Bishop & Donlan, 2005; Fey, et al, 2004; Pearce, McCormack, & James, 2003; Reilly, et al, 2004). Aspects of content and form have also been shown to be correlated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%