2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00025-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the accuracies and inaccuracies of personality perception following Internet-mediated communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These have found similar results to those based on observed behaviour and face-to-face communication, namely that people could rate the Extraversion and Openness levels of targets with reasonable accuracy, but no such evidence for Neuroticism. In contrast, others have found little or no convergence between observer ratings of personality and self-ratings on the basis of an instant messaging conversation and a web-chat (Rouse & Haas, 2003), or interactions via video-conferencing (Okdie, Guadagno, Bernieri, Geers and Mclarney-Vesotski, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These have found similar results to those based on observed behaviour and face-to-face communication, namely that people could rate the Extraversion and Openness levels of targets with reasonable accuracy, but no such evidence for Neuroticism. In contrast, others have found little or no convergence between observer ratings of personality and self-ratings on the basis of an instant messaging conversation and a web-chat (Rouse & Haas, 2003), or interactions via video-conferencing (Okdie, Guadagno, Bernieri, Geers and Mclarney-Vesotski, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For instance, email pseudonyms that offer insight into a sender’s personality (e.g., Happygrl@any.com) or work ethic (e.g., slacker@any.net) might increase predictability, such that they increase others’ desire to work or hang out with them. Recent research has explored the impact of computer mediation on perceived personality (Rouse & Haas, 2003), and research in group communication and social perception supports the premise that an individual’s preference to work with others is guided by the social perceptions he or she has of them (Ambady, Hallahan, & Rosenthal, 1995; Cesario, Plaks, & Higgins, 2006). Therefore, we advance the following hypotheses:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cues can be nominal and text-based, such as usernames, emoticons, and even writing style [9,10] but even these nominal cues can be used to form impressions of useful social categories such as gender and disposition [9,11]. In general, these CMC-specific cues reveal accurate information about individuals' personality, however, a high degree of accuracy is achieved in text-based interactions [12], despite the availability of simplest of the cues such as an email address [13]. However, some researchers show that this accuracy is lower than that found in face-to-face interactions [14].…”
Section: Related Work 21 Construction Of Impressions In Computermedmentioning
confidence: 99%