2020 IEEE Winter Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/wacvw50321.2020.9096918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Techniques to Improve Activity Recognition using Human Pose Skeletons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 7 illustrates the resulted average accuracies. [19] 91.1 98.3 −1.0 KcWKNN (on WVU) [19] 92.4 98.7 −1.1 3D Convolutional [21] 82.30 90.40 9.84 Convolutional Two Stream Fusion [23] 92.50 94.20 1.84 Improved two streams architecture [25] 94.00 94.20 0.21 Two Stream Fusion Convolutional [26] 92.70 93.60 0.97 Convolutional (ResNet-101) [24] 67.96 84.44 24.25 Two Stream Fusion MLP-LSTM [30] 79.21 96.92 22.36 Convnet conv-Lstm [27] 75.40 77.90 3.32 As shown in Table 7, our proposed technique achieved an acceptable level of performance in terms of average accuracy in almost every state-of-the-art classifier in the domain of video-based activity recognition. Indeed, the growth method achieved such performance with a significantly smaller number of required features to identify activities.…”
Section: Performance Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 7 illustrates the resulted average accuracies. [19] 91.1 98.3 −1.0 KcWKNN (on WVU) [19] 92.4 98.7 −1.1 3D Convolutional [21] 82.30 90.40 9.84 Convolutional Two Stream Fusion [23] 92.50 94.20 1.84 Improved two streams architecture [25] 94.00 94.20 0.21 Two Stream Fusion Convolutional [26] 92.70 93.60 0.97 Convolutional (ResNet-101) [24] 67.96 84.44 24.25 Two Stream Fusion MLP-LSTM [30] 79.21 96.92 22.36 Convnet conv-Lstm [27] 75.40 77.90 3.32 As shown in Table 7, our proposed technique achieved an acceptable level of performance in terms of average accuracy in almost every state-of-the-art classifier in the domain of video-based activity recognition. Indeed, the growth method achieved such performance with a significantly smaller number of required features to identify activities.…”
Section: Performance Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain feature vectors invariant to a rigid body and affine transformations and to increase the generalizability of our approach, we based our calculation on image output and not on raw keypoints coordinates (Fig. 1) [41].…”
Section: Clinical Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%