Exploring Tangible Ways to Evaluate User Experience for Elders

Rodríguez, Iyubanit; Karyda, Maria; Lucero, Andrés; Herskovic, Valeria

doi:10.1145/3170427.3188450

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Increasingly these interactive surveys or feedback devices have been adopted in HCI research in more tangible forms of questionnaires [28,29,31,32] which have been used to collect data from public audiences drawing on the material properties and affordances of physical artefacts to engage different audiences in the topic of the study, e.g. surveying fablab visitors [32], children [28] or elderly audiences [67]. In public settings, tangible questionnaires offer the possibility to be physically situated within their context and to call on people's curiosity and desire to investigate a unique or novel artefact [36].…”

Section: Study Design and Methods Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Should I Agree?

Nissen

Neumann

Mikusz

et al. 2019

Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Obtaining meaningful user consent is increasingly problematic in a world of numerous, heterogeneous digital services. Current approaches (e.g. agreeing to Terms and Conditions) are rooted in the idea of individual control despite growing evidence that users do not (or cannot) exercise such control in informed ways. We consider an alternative approach whereby users can opt to delegate consent decisions to an ecosystem of third-parties including friends, experts, groups and AI entities. We present the results of a study that used a technology probe at a large festival to explore initial public responses to this reframing-focusing on when and to whom users would delegate such decisions. The results reveal substantial public interest in delegating consent and identify differing preferences depending on the privacy context, highlighting the need for alternative decision mechanisms beyond the current focus on individual choice.

show abstract

Section: Study Design and Methods Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Should I Agree?

Nissen

Neumann

Mikusz

et al. 2019

Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Book The book presents 16 questions, a shortened version of the UX questionnaire AttrakDiff, which were selected using as a base the version used in [20]. The final version of the questionnaire is presented in Table 2 in Spanish and English.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Aestimo is based on a previous work (published as late breaking work) focusing on the design of Aestimo, which was at the time a non-functional prototype [20]. Instead, this paper presents (1) Aestimo's implementation and (2) the evaluation of the functional prototype with 20 older adults.…”

Section: Aestimomentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this paper, we aim to explore the following research questions: 1) Are the results obtained through a TUI similar to those from a paper-and-pen-based questionnaire?, and 2) What is the perception of older adults of a TUI for reporting UX?. To answer these questions, we designed a tangible interface kit called Aestimo (based on a prototype described in [20]), which allows users to input their user experience, emotion and overall opinion. Subsequently, we recruited 20 older adults to test our interface.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Aestimo: A Tangible Kit to Evaluate Older Adults’ User Experience

Rodríguez

Karyda

Lucero

et al. 2019

Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Surveys and questionnaires are commonly used to capture people's experiences with technology. However, some older users experience issues when reading and filling out forms, and inexperienced computer users may not be comfortable with web-based versions. To improve the report of user experience, we designed and implemented Aestimo, a tangible interface based on a shortened version of the AttrakDiff questionnaire. The interface was evaluated during a study with 20 older adults (age avg.=65.6). Although completing the Aestimo questionnaire took longer than a paper-and-pen version of AttrakDiff, 60% of participants preferred Aestimo over AttrakDiff. Aestimo was found to be innovative and inviting, and to stimulate the senses and the mind. Participants liked feeling guided by the interface, and also found their experience to be playful and fun. Overall, the evaluation of Aestimo was highly positive and suggests that some user groups may benefit from the availability of innovative evaluation experiences.

show abstract

“…As such, tangible interface could be adopted to provide physical feedback and overcome the limitations of screen-based interfaces. Literature has reported tangible interfaces are more accessible and suitable for the needs of the elderly, and interactions that remind them of familiar devices have a higher acceptance (Rodríguez, Karyda, Lucero, & Herskovic, 2018). Metaphor in the interface could reduce barriers of the elderly to use as well as reduce learning time (Irizarry, Downing, & West, 2002).…”

Section: Designing For Older Adults' Storytellingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing for Older Adults' Life Storytelling through a Tangible Interactive Device

Li¹,

Hu²,

HENGEVELD³

et al. 2019

Conference proceedings of ADIM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There appears to be a mismatch between current interactive media and intergenerational storytelling, which leads to the elderly are often viewed as passive consumers, rather than active creators of story content. In this paper, we present our study aiming to facilitate storytelling of older adults living in the care facilities with their children, driven by the research questions: RQ1: What life stories would the older adults like to share? And RQ2: How to facilitate older adults to tell stories with their children? A research prototype named Slots-story was designed, which integrated functions of memory cue generator, story recording, and preservation. In the field study, eight pairs of participants (each pair consisting of an elderly adult and his/her child) were recruited to use the prototype for around ten days. Semi-structured interviews were conducted both with the elderly and their children. Stories collected were transcribed, and thematic analysis was conducted, which formed the foundation of the insights on the research questions.

show abstract

Exploring Tangible Ways to Evaluate User Experience for Elders

Cited by 8 publications

References 11 publications

Should I Agree?

Should I Agree?

Aestimo: A Tangible Kit to Evaluate Older Adults’ User Experience

Designing for Older Adults' Life Storytelling through a Tangible Interactive Device

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About