2016
DOI: 10.1039/c5dt01918d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring structural and electronic effects in three isomers of tris{bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl}borane: towards the combined electrochemical-frustrated Lewis pair activation of H2

Abstract: Three structural isomers of tris{bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl}borane have been studied as the acidic component of frustrated Lewis pairs. While the 3,5-substituted isomer is already known to heterolytically cleave H2 to generate a bridging-hydride; ortho-substituents in the 2,4- and 2,5-isomers quench such reactivity through electron donation into the vacant boron pz orbital and steric blocking of the boron centre; as shown by electrochemical, structural and computational studies. Electrochemical studies of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
7
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternative bulky groups with higher electron affinities should enhance acceptor strength while maintaining or even enhancing the desired chemical stability of the systems. [6,12,28,[36][37][38][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] Exploiting this favorable property, some of us recently reported a series of air-stable bis (fluoromesityl)boryl ((FMes) 2 B) derivatives, namely compounds 1-3 (Scheme 1) with different electron-donating groups for comparison, i. e., phenyl, 4-tert-butylphenyl and 4-N,N-diphenylaminophenyl, respectively, attached to the electron acceptor group (FMes) 2 B through BÀ C bonds. [12] Comparison of these (FMes) 2 B-containing donor-acceptor compounds with compound 4, which contains a (Mes) 2 B group (Scheme 1), confirms that (FMes) 2 B is a much stronger acceptor, leading to: (i) a larger quinoidal distortion in the ground state structure; (ii) significantly red-shifted emission in solution and in the solid state; (iii) stronger emission solvatochromism; and (iv) significantly lower reduction potentials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative bulky groups with higher electron affinities should enhance acceptor strength while maintaining or even enhancing the desired chemical stability of the systems. [6,12,28,[36][37][38][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] Exploiting this favorable property, some of us recently reported a series of air-stable bis (fluoromesityl)boryl ((FMes) 2 B) derivatives, namely compounds 1-3 (Scheme 1) with different electron-donating groups for comparison, i. e., phenyl, 4-tert-butylphenyl and 4-N,N-diphenylaminophenyl, respectively, attached to the electron acceptor group (FMes) 2 B through BÀ C bonds. [12] Comparison of these (FMes) 2 B-containing donor-acceptor compounds with compound 4, which contains a (Mes) 2 B group (Scheme 1), confirms that (FMes) 2 B is a much stronger acceptor, leading to: (i) a larger quinoidal distortion in the ground state structure; (ii) significantly red-shifted emission in solution and in the solid state; (iii) stronger emission solvatochromism; and (iv) significantly lower reduction potentials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two other interesting examples with similar structures are (2,4-Ar F ) 3 B (UMUHIT; Cornet et al, 2003) and (2,5-Ar F ) 3 B (AJAGID; Blagg et al, 2016), which feature boron centres with three aryl rings carrying one o-CF 3 group and one p-CF 3 (UMUHIT) or m-CF 3 group (AJAGID) each. The three B-C bonds are exactly equal in UMUHIT [1.582 (4) Å ] and are similar in AJAGID [1.568 (3), 1.582 (3) and 1.583 (3) Å ], but, astonishingly, the C-B-C bond angles show quite a variation [117.0 (2), 117.6 (2) and 124.7 (2) in UMUHIT, and 116.98 (17), 119.12 (17) and 123.60 (17) in AJAGID].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, two homoleptic triarylboranes carrying 2,4-or 2,5-CF 3 -substituted phenyl rings have been introduced as FLP components (Blagg et al, 2016). In combination with Lewis bases, neither of these compounds exhibits any reactivity towards H 2 , which is due to both electronic and steric effects (Blagg et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All energiesa re in kcal mol À1 .R egarding the LA in entry 3a nd entries 4-7-see Refs [19]. All energiesa re in kcal mol À1 .R egarding the LA in entry 3a nd entries 4-7-see Refs [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The barrier heights, DE # (DG # ), for the heterolytic H 2 -cleavage by as eries of [LA-OH 2 acetone]c omplexes plus dioxane as Lewis basic solvent molecule;a nd,t he total change of the potentiala nd the Gibbsf ree energies, DE (DG), for the resultanth ydrogenationo fa cetone.T he bulk solvent (dioxane)i sd escribed by the continuums olvent model COSMO. All energiesa re in kcal mol À1 .R egarding the LA in entry 3a nd entries 4-7-see Refs [19]. and[20] for details,respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%