2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/5547749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Strategies for Improving Green Open Spaces in Old Downtown Residential Communities from the Perspective of Public Health to Enhance the Health and Well-Being of the Aged

Abstract: Based on the trend of global aging, people are paying more and more attention to the health of the elderly and the improvement of green open spaces. However, few studies have focused on strategies to improve green spaces in response to this trend. Especially, with the outbreak of COVID-19, an urgent need to develop a sustainable system strategy to improve the health of the elderly in residential communities in old districts has emerged. Traditional improvement strategies based on current situation evaluation o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the data collection operation, with respect to which question form is easier to understand than ANP for experts, DEMATEL only requires pair-wise comparisons of the criterion level by asking questions, such as how much influence criterion A has on criterion B in determining the degree using a scale of 0 (almost no influence) to 4 (highest influence). This scale has been used in other research as well (e.g., Li et al, 2021; Zhang et al, 2021; Zhu et al, 2017). The AHP and DEMATEL questionnaires were distributed to experts who had previously answered the fuzzy Delphi questionnaire, and nine valid questionnaires were collected.…”
Section: Methods and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the data collection operation, with respect to which question form is easier to understand than ANP for experts, DEMATEL only requires pair-wise comparisons of the criterion level by asking questions, such as how much influence criterion A has on criterion B in determining the degree using a scale of 0 (almost no influence) to 4 (highest influence). This scale has been used in other research as well (e.g., Li et al, 2021; Zhang et al, 2021; Zhu et al, 2017). The AHP and DEMATEL questionnaires were distributed to experts who had previously answered the fuzzy Delphi questionnaire, and nine valid questionnaires were collected.…”
Section: Methods and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FDM used in our study integrated expert opinions by using the “double triangular fuzzy numbers,” as provided by Jeng (2001). Jeng suggested an 11-point scale to assess experts’ level of agreement, and this usage has been continued in subsequent studies (e.g., Li et al, 2021; Zhang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Methods and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the results can assist decision makers in focusing on a small number of core dimensions or criteria from an influence perspective ( 21 ). Researchers have applied this method to various topics such as medical decision-making ( 21 , 22 ), nurse evaluation ( 23 ), education ( 24 , 25 ), design evaluation ( 26 ), and open space planning ( 27 ). The calculation process is presented in our research and is implemented using Excel 2016 software ( 21 23 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identify gaps of alternatives and find out a better alternative, then making right improvement strategies base on occurring reasons of the gap. urban neighborhood green spaces under public health orientation [25].…”
Section: Identifying the Priority Criteria Of Characteristic Town As ...mentioning
confidence: 99%