Exploring spatial nonstationary environmental effects on Yellow Perch distribution in Lake Erie

Abstract

Background Global regression models under an implicit assumption of spatial stationarity were commonly applied to estimate the environmental effects on aquatic species distribution. However, the relationships between species distribution and environmental variables may change among spatial locations, especially at large spatial scales with complicated habitat. Local regression models are appropriate supplementary tools to explore species-environment relationships at finer scales. Method We applied geographically weighted regression (GWR) models on Yellow Perch in Lake Erie to estimate spatially-varying environmental effects on the presence probabilities of this species. Outputs from GWR were compared with those from generalized additive models (GAMs) in exploring the Yellow Perch distribution. Local regression coefficients from the GWR were mapped to visualize spatially-varying species-environment relationships. K-means cluster analyses based on the t-values of GWR local regression coefficients were used to characterize the distinct zones of ecological relationships. Results Geographically weighted regression resulted in a significant improvement over the GAM in goodness-of-fit and accuracy of model prediction. Results from the GWR revealed the magnitude and direction of environmental effects on Yellow Perch distribution changed among spatial locations. Consistent species-environment relationships were found in the west and east basins for adults. The different kinds of species-environment relationships found in the central management unit (MU) implied the variation of relationships at a scale finer than the MU. Conclusions This study draws attention to the importance of accounting for spatial nonstationarity in exploring species-environment relationships. The GWR results can provide support for identification of unique stocks and potential refinement of the current jurisdictional MU structure toward more ecologically relevant MUs for the sustainable management of Yellow Perch in Lake Erie.

Biodiversity and the Recreational Value of Green Infrastructure in England

“…The quality of GI can be evaluated using GIS and spatial modelling, where a set of spatial criteria may be combined with remote sensing data or other geographical representation and a scale of importance to determine regional environmental quality in order to direct restoration efforts [35]. For instance, a study looking at the effects on the spatial distribution of yellow perch in Lake Erie [36] utilised a geographically weighted regression model to visualise the effects of environmental variables on the wildlife species and aid in the management of fish stocks by improving the discrete areas at which the stocks are managed. Two of the management units reflected the discrete environmental variables, but the central management unit had environmental variables that acted on fish stocks at a finer scale.…”

Examining Scale Dependent Environmental Effects on American Lobster (Homarus americanus) Spatial Distribution in a Changing Gulf of Maine

“…This technique also assumes that nonlinear (but stationary) relationships between lobster density and environmental factors are sufficient to accurately predict a species spatial distribution across an ecologically complex region. Other literature has highlighted differences in environment-abundance relationships between localized regions (Li et al, 2018;Liu et al, 2019). Thus, the bisected (comprized of West-GAM and East1-GAM) and trisected (comprized of West-GAM, Central-GAM, and East2-GAM) models were constructed at smaller spatial scales to capture evidence of these differences.…”

Relationships between environmental variables and spatial and temporal distribution of jack mackerel (Trachurus japonicus) in the Beibu Gulf, South China Sea

“…Thus, it may be more populated and robust for modeling and the spatial distribution of species ( Leathwick, Elith & Hastie, 2006 ; Schmiing et al, 2013 ). Meanwhile, GAMs are regarded as informative tools in fisheries management, and they have been widely used in recent years ( Auth et al, 2011 ; Choi, Min & Soh, 2021 ; Hua et al, 2019 ; Knutsen et al, 2007 ; Liu et al, 2019 ). While quantitative relationships between fishing grounds and environmental factors have used GAMs ( Arcos, Cubillos & Núez, 2001 ; Chen & Tian, 2007 ; Cornic & Rooker, 2018 ; Feng et al, 2021 ; Maxwell et al, 2012 ; Yu et al, 2019 ; Hou et al, 2021 ), few studies have investigated relationships between T. japonicus fishing grounds and environmental factors in the Beibu Gulf.…”