2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab61f4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Solar Wind Origins and Connecting Plasma Flows from the Parker Solar Probe to 1 au: Nonspherical Source Surface and Alfvénic Fluctuations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
69
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
6
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, narrow holes expanding above active regions or between pseudostreamers could support a slow wind solution (Panasenco et al 2019). The existence of Alfvènic slow wind, that is, slow wind streams containing the typically fast-wind turbulence made up of outwardly propagating Alfvèn waves (see Panasenco et al 2020 and references therein), may be confirmation of the latter idea.…”
Section: Origin Of Steady and Nonsteady Slow Solar Windmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, narrow holes expanding above active regions or between pseudostreamers could support a slow wind solution (Panasenco et al 2019). The existence of Alfvènic slow wind, that is, slow wind streams containing the typically fast-wind turbulence made up of outwardly propagating Alfvèn waves (see Panasenco et al 2020 and references therein), may be confirmation of the latter idea.…”
Section: Origin Of Steady and Nonsteady Slow Solar Windmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this case, the two spacecraft would actually be traversing the exact same plasma parcel, changed only by ongoing dynamical processes occurring over time τ. Tentative examples of the two types were provided for PSP encounter E1 in Panasenco et al (2020). Again, composition and ionization states should remain unaltered during the transport, meaning that such measurements from SO would allow an essentially unambiguous determination of alignment in this case as well.…”
Section: Synergistic Configurations Of Psp and Somentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the latter interpretation is correct, the HCS crossings of future orbits, occurring ever closer to the helmet streamer tips, should shed new light on the instability of the forming HCS and the origin of the slow solar wind. Probe at perihelion appeared to be immersed in solar wind coming from a rapidly expanding small coronal hole Panasenco et al 2020). Though very large magnetic field inversions in the radial magnetic field were observed throughout the interval, these were not reconnecting current sheets but rather large-amplitude Alfvénic structures and rotational discontinuities, associated with bursty radial jets (Kasper et al 2019).…”
Section: Probing Reconnection In Situ: Mms and Parker Solar Probementioning
confidence: 98%
“…2019; Panasenco et al. 2020). Though very large magnetic field inversions in the radial magnetic field were observed throughout the interval, these were not reconnecting current sheets but rather large-amplitude Alfvénic structures and rotational discontinuities, associated with bursty radial jets (Kasper et al.…”
Section: Understanding the Onset Problem: A Common Goal Of Astrophysimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among different extrapolation methods, the Potential Field Source Surface (PFSS) extrapolation (Hundhausen, 1972) gives an approximate description of the coronal fields from the solar surface to the so-called source surface (a sphere with radius between 1.6 and 3.25 solar radii, with 2.5 often used as standard value (Altschuler and Newkirk, 1969;Hoeksema, 1984)), by assuming the absence of currents in the inner corona (see discussion by Lee et al, 2011). This is a strong assumption (solar eruptions occur only in coronal regions where non-potential field configurations are created), and recent results from Parker Solar Probe are now allowing to measure the non-sphericity of the Source Surface (Panasenco et al, 2020), but the PFSS is often used as a well established technique providing a quite good description of the overall coronal field configuration and the location of open and closed field regions (Nitta et al, 2006;Mandrini et al, 2014). Other extrapolation methods exist, but requires high-resolution vector magnetic fields measurements (De Rosa et al, 2009;Aschwanden, 2016), something that (alike LOS magnetograms) is also not currently available for the whole photosphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%