2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
518
1
10

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 435 publications
(552 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(140 reference statements)
23
518
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The stress is on the members of the organization who generate a sense together to build organizational activities, a mission by directing the objectives and the entire activity of their members. The framework in which the members of the organization run their activities can influence the way in which the organizational roles are built and the way in which they adopt the roles played (Carsten, Uhl-Bien, West, Patera, & McGregor, 2010). Katz & Kahn (1966) define the role in terms of expectations, assigned roles, data, behaviour patterns.…”
Section: From Sense To Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stress is on the members of the organization who generate a sense together to build organizational activities, a mission by directing the objectives and the entire activity of their members. The framework in which the members of the organization run their activities can influence the way in which the organizational roles are built and the way in which they adopt the roles played (Carsten, Uhl-Bien, West, Patera, & McGregor, 2010). Katz & Kahn (1966) define the role in terms of expectations, assigned roles, data, behaviour patterns.…”
Section: From Sense To Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В его рамках тот или иной стиль лидерства или дискретные ви-ды поведения лидера рассматриваются как независимые переменные, и анализ на-правлен на выявление результатов, реак-ций на те или иные виды управленческих воздействий. В отличие от него подход, сфокусированный на «последователях» (follower-centric perspective) [Замулин, 2009;Baker, Wurgler, 2007;Carsten et al, 2010;Hsu, Chen, 2011;Marinova, Van Dyne, Moon, 2015], ставит в центр анализа под-чиненных (на наш взгляд, в организаци-онном контексте этот термин более аде-кватен, чем дословный перевод «последо-ватели»). Именно этот подход, исходящий из понимания управления как двунаправ-ленного процесса, наиболее перспективен для анализа образа руководителя в созна-нии его подчиненных.…”
Section: трансформационный лидер глазами подчиненных: подход сфокусиunclassified
“…Similarly, work on relational leadership theory (Uhl-Bien, 2006), leadership complexity theory (Uhl-Bien, Marion, & McKelvey, 2007), and distributed leadership (Gronn, 2002) have sought to treat leadership as an 'interactive dynamic relationship between organizational actors from which adaptive outcomes emerge' and which emphasize the importance of 'interdependence, coordination and…reciprocal influence' (Bligh, 2011, p. 427). Followership research has demonstrated that it has multiple meanings, and that followers construct those meanings not just in relation to their own individual perceptions, but also in relation to their organizational context and to the leaders with whom they interact (Carsten, Uhl-Bein, West, Patera, & McGregor, 2010). Heifetz, Grashow and Linksy's (2009) analysis of adaptive leadership is particularly useful in understanding group dynamics and the crucial leadership skill of empowering groups to deal with issues and challenges in relation to the group's context, rather than the leader simply dictating action from above ('t Hart, 2014, p. 105).…”
Section: Leadership and Followershipmentioning
confidence: 99%