Exploring SETAC's roles in the global dialogue on sustainability—an opening debate

Abstract

A combination platform–debate session was held at the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) North America annual meeting in Boston (November 2011). The session was organized by members of the Advisory Group on Sustainability, newly formed and approved as a global entity by the SETAC World Council just prior to the meeting. The platform portion of the session provided a historical backdrop for the debate that was designed to explore SETAC's role in the sustainability dialogue. The debate portion presented arguments for and against the proposition that “Science is the primary contribution of SETAC to the global dialogue on sustainability.” Although the debate was not designed to achieve a definitive sustainability policy for SETAC, the audience clearly rejected the proposition, indicating a desire from the SETAC membership for an expanded role in global sustainability forums. This commentary details the key elements of the session, identifies the contribution the Advisory Group will have at the World Congress in Berlin (May 2012), and invites interested persons to become active in the Advisory Group. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2013; 9: 7–11. © 2012 SETAC

A modified eco‐efficiency framework and methodology for advancing the state of practice of sustainability analysis as applied to green infrastructure

“…There is no universal suite of sustainability metrics ( McCormick et al 2013 ; Stahl and Bridges 2013 ). The number and type of indicators vary by research focus and sector: Examples from the transportation and manufacturing sectors range from 3 environmental indicators (greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions, energy use, and water withdrawals) to 5 environmental indicators to 10 environmental indicators and 1 economic indicator ( Kuosmanen and Kortelainen 2005 ; Kortelainen and Kuosmanen 2007 ; Leal et al 2012 ; Tatari and Kucukvar 2012 ).…”

The rationale for moving beyond monetization in valuing ecosystem services

“…Yet ecological economics models still follow the basic approaches of neoclassical economics. To wit, the central question for ecological economics is “how large is the ecology that can fit within the economy?” which, following the single pillar of sustainability (McCormick et al ), is not a useful way of looking at the issue.…”