Exploring self-reflection in dual relationship decision-making

Abstract

Summary Social workers practicing in small rural towns regularly encounter overlapping or dual relationships with clients. This can lead to boundary crossing and conflicts of interest that require an ethical decision. Previous research on how rural social workers approach ethical decision-making in these situations has suggested that while they might draw on ethical codes, many rely on intuitive or personal viewpoints rather than systematic decision-making processes. Although social workers are often trained to engage in self-reflection when faced with the complexities of practice and the possibilities of personal biases, the role of systematic self-reflection in personal decision-making about dual relationships has not been sufficiently documented in the literature. Using qualitative inquiry, this study explored the lived experiences with dual relationships reported by 44 practitioners working in small towns in rural Canada. Findings The findings confirm that practitioners were frequently guided in their decisions by an intuitive or emotional understanding of dual relationships rather than by external codes, and while self-reflection was seen to play a role, a formal or systematic approach to personal self-reflection was not reported. Applications The findings suggest that educational or professional development on more intentional use of self-reflection in practice would aid in safeguarding the client and the worker when dealing with dual relationships, while providing an ethical process congruent with a rural and remote community identity. Explicit decision-making would also make the process more defensible and justifiable, not only to themselves, but also to colleagues, supervisors, and to their professional association.

Landscapes of support for farming mental health: Adaptability in the face of crisis

“…However, it is worth noting that for all methods, the sample achieved covered the breadth of the three categories identified in Figure 1-14 agricultural (10 farming mental health charities [regional and national], one industry group, three peer groups [farmer groups or farmer support groups]), six pastoral (two chaplains, three health care, one local council) and two social support (one auction mart staff, one local community group). Noting the research of Pugh (2007) and Brownlee et al (2019) about the dual relationships of rural support workers, several interviewees performed multiple roles; for example, mental health charity workers often lived in farming communities, helped to organise agricultural shows, farmed themselves or took part in community groups. We spoke to chaplains, a community group, and an auction mart staff member who provided a more informal perspective of social support.…”

Weaponizing Clinical Mental Health in Family Justice Courts: Ethical and Legal Minefields

“…The tension further arises between the rights of the vulnerable to withdraw from that treatment and the right to informed consent before releasing confidential information (National Association of Social Workers [NASW], 2017, 5.02(b), 5.02(i); Reamer, 2005). These tensions are particularly acute when there are dual relationships when working with family systems, marriage counseling, and parent-child reunification (Barsky, 2019;Brownlee et al, 2019), much less when an expert has a financial interest in giving an opinion or funneling child to a P.A. isolation program (Mercer, 2021).…”

Nurses' tension-based ethical decision making in rural acute care settings

“…19 The RNs shared some of the difficult ethical issues and conflicts that they had experienced. Ethical conflicts had the potential to occur when the nurses were working with locum physicians, 20 working with limited resources to care for patients and families, 21,22 dealing with dual or professional-personal relationships, 23,24 and maintaining patient confidentiality. 25 Some ethical issues were very similar to ethical issues reported in the nursing literature.…”