Exploring reasons for attrition among vulnerable and under-served sub-groups across an online integrated healthy lifestyles service during COVID-19

Abstract

Objectives: Reported health behaviour change intervention attrition rates vary considerably, from 10% to more than 80%, depending on the type and setting of the treatment programme. A better understanding of the determinants of programme adherence is required. Between March and August 2020, a convenience sample of 44 individual telephone interviews, as well as 42 online Qualtrics surveys took place. The objective was to explore perceived barriers, facilitators, and opportunities for participation, sustained participation as well as initial non-participation to better understand reasons for attrition in online delivery during the COVID-19 lockdown among vulnerable and under-served groups within an Integrated Healthy Lifestyle Service (IHLS). Methods: A convenience sample of 44 individual telephone interviews, as well as 42 online Qualtrics surveys resulted in a total of 86 (33 male) individuals comprising intervention clients. Clients included children and young people (n = 16), manual workers (n = 7), Black, Asian or Minority Ethnic (n = 19), physical disability (n = 8), learning disability (n = 6), and those from areas of high deprivation (n = 19), as well as Integrated Healthy Lifestyle Service practitioners (n = 11). Results: The study revealed that more resources and support are needed for Black, Asian or Minority Ethnic; manual worker; learning disability; and high-deprivation sub-groups in order to reduce attrition rates. Specifically, a lack of technological equipment and competence of using such equipment was identified as key barriers to initial and sustained attendance among these vulnerable and under-served sub-groups during the COVID-19 lockdown. Conclusion: The pattern of differences in attrition during the COVID-19 lockdown suggests that further research is required to explore how best to ensure online health behaviour change offers are scalable and accessible to all.

Integrating conversations about disordered eating in children and young people into routine type 1 diabetes care: a practical guide

“…The PRIORITY trial's overall retention rates have since been reported as 48% completing one‐ and three‐month follow‐up assessments and 75% completing at least one follow‐up assessment. Such retention rates are in line with published expectations for online behaviour change interventions during the COVID‐19 pandemic 11 . Table 1 shows the sample demographics.…”

“…Such retention rates are in line with pub lished expectations for online behav iour change interventions during the COVID19 pandemic. 11 Table 1 shows the sample demographics. The most frequently reported insulin regimen was multiple daily injections (50%, n=10).…”

Impact of community-driven interventions on dietary and physical activity outcomes among a cohort of adults in a rural Appalachian county in Eastern Kentucky, 2019–2022

“…From baseline to follow-up, we experienced 38.8% attrition. However, similar levels of attrition have been reported for other community-based projects assessing health behavior change (67,68). Finally, it should be noted that this research team is comprised of white women who work within a higher education setting and within the Extension system in a metro area.…”

Attrition in Conversational Agent–Delivered Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

“…In general, factors shown to be associated with attrition in trials of digital health interventions include poor user experience, a lack of perceived value, and privacy concerns [ 28 , 29 ]; for example, studies on mental health apps reported technical issues and errors that might affect users’ overall experience [ 15 , 30 ]. Qualitative findings further suggested that factors such as a lack of human interactions in digital health interventions and users’ technological competence also played a role in participants’ attrition [ 31 ].…”