Exploring Public Attitudes Towards Approaches to Discussing Costs in the Clinical Encounter

Abstract

BACKGROUND:Patients' willingness to discuss costs of treatment alternatives with their physicians is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To explore public attitudes toward doctorpatient discussions of insurer and out-of-pocket costs and to examine whether several possible communication strategies might enhance patient receptivity to discussing costs with their physicians. DESIGN: Focus group discussions and pre-discussion and post-discussion questionnaires. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and eleven insured individuals with mean age of 48 years, 51 % female, 34 % African American, 27 % Latino, and 50 % with incomes below 300 % of the federal poverty threshold, participated in 22 focus groups in Santa Monica, CA and in the Washington, DC metro area. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Attitudes toward discussing out-of-pocket and insurer costs with physicians, and towards physicians' role in controlling costs; receptivity toward recommended communication strategies regarding costs. KEY RESULTS: Participants expressed more willingness to talk to doctors about personal costs than insurer costs. Older participants and sicker participants were more willing to talk to the doctor about all costs than younger and healthier participants (OR=1.8, p=0.004; OR=1.6, p =0.027 respectively). Participants who face cost-related barriers to accessing health care were in greater agreement than others that doctors should play a role in reducing out-of-pocket costs (OR=2.4, p=0.011). Participants did not endorse recommended communication strategies for discussing costs in the clinical encounter. In contrast, participants stated that trust in one's physician would enhance their willingness to discuss costs. Perceived impediments to discussing costs included rushed, impersonal visits, and clinicians who are insufficiently informed about costs. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that trusting relationships may be more conducive than any particular discussion strategy to facilitating doctor-patient

What Strategies Do Physicians and Patients Discuss to Reduce Out-of-Pocket Costs? Analysis of Cost-Saving Strategies in 1,755 Outpatient Clinic Visits

“…2,4–7 Consequently, Americans have more financial ‘skin in the game’ than ever before, and 59–80% of patients want to discuss healthcare costs with their physicians. 20,49–51 With nearly half of cost discussions involving cost-reducing strategies, our findings suggest that patient-physician discussion about out-of-pocket costs may be a helpful tool in addressing patients’ financial distress. However, since the majority of clinic visits did not contain cost discussions, our study may highlight a need for additional efforts in promoting physician-patient cost communication.…”

Effectiveness of Standardized Patient Simulations in Teaching Clinical Communication Skills to Dental Students

“…Thus, this information was not actively practiced and reinforced-necessary components for increased retention. 26 It appears that the value of discussing out-of-pocket costs was recognized, as one study found that a majority of both patients (63%) and physicians (79%) reported cost was worthy of discussion. 32 Similarly, one study found that effective medical simulation clearly tied simulation outcomes to professional contexts and behaviors.…”

Treating, Fast and Slow: Americans’ Understanding of and Responses to Low‐Value Care

“…There is little published research on the impact of the Choosing Wisely campaign on public perceptions, although a smattering of evidence suggests that many Americans are now aware that particular tests or treatments may be unnecessary . Research on the public's understanding and preferences regarding the role of cost in clinical decisions, however, suggests that changing consumers’ attitudes and behaviors with respect to low‐value care may not be easy. Findings from this research on cost highlight several specific challenges for changing attitudes and expectations with respect to low‐value care.…”