2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring phylogeny of the microsoroid ferns (Polypodiaceae) based on six plastid DNA markers

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
20
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Field) differed from the other species assigned to Colysis C. Presl (= Leptochilus). Phylogenetic analyses showed this species to belong Dendroconche, and not to Leptochilus (Chen et al 2020;Testo et al 2019). In addition, spore ornamentation of the broadly defined Phymatosorus Pic.Serm has been found to be heterogenous (Tryon and Lugardon 1991), which is consistent with the polyphyly of the genus in the latest phylogenetic analyses (Chen et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Field) differed from the other species assigned to Colysis C. Presl (= Leptochilus). Phylogenetic analyses showed this species to belong Dendroconche, and not to Leptochilus (Chen et al 2020;Testo et al 2019). In addition, spore ornamentation of the broadly defined Phymatosorus Pic.Serm has been found to be heterogenous (Tryon and Lugardon 1991), which is consistent with the polyphyly of the genus in the latest phylogenetic analyses (Chen et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Based on the latest hypothesis of phylogeny, and the available spore surface data, we chose species from each of the 15 out of 16 currently accepted genera, plus two Microsorum groups MG4 and MG5 (Chen et al 2020;Testo et al 2019;Zhang et al 2020), with at least one species per genus/group, but recently described Ellipinema (Zhang et al 2020) was not included because we did not have access to any material of this new genus. We also considered the subclades of larger genera, such as Lepisorus, and sampled them as thoroughly as possible (Wang et al 2010;Zhao et al 2019).…”
Section: Taxon Sampling and The Chloroplast Dna Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations