2013
DOI: 10.1037/a0028049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring personal and organizational determinants of workplace bullying and its prevalence in a Japanese sample.

Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this study is twofold. First, we examine the prevalence rate of workplace bullying among employees in Japan. Second, we explore antecedents of bullying exposure at work in this population. Method: 699 employees recruited in 5 labor unions in the Tokyo area (Japan) voluntarily participated in this questionnaire-based study. We provided participants with a definition of bullying and asked them to indicate whether or not they have been bullied during the last six months according to this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
46
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Sex, seniority and job status were used to control for the relationship between perceived employability, fear of the economic crisis and psychological distress, since these demographic variables might be related to stress related constructs (e.g., Berntson et al, 2006, Giorgi, Ando, Arenas, Shoss, & Leon-Perez, 2013b. We also controlled for other known predictors of psychological distress, specifically job demands, lack of job control and workplace bullying.…”
Section: Study Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sex, seniority and job status were used to control for the relationship between perceived employability, fear of the economic crisis and psychological distress, since these demographic variables might be related to stress related constructs (e.g., Berntson et al, 2006, Giorgi, Ando, Arenas, Shoss, & Leon-Perez, 2013b. We also controlled for other known predictors of psychological distress, specifically job demands, lack of job control and workplace bullying.…”
Section: Study Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex, seniority and job position were included as control variables because they have been identified as possible confounders of the relation between working conditions and employee well-being (e.g., Berntson et al, 2006;Giorgi et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Stress Questionnaire (Sq)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scarce research confirms that bullying may differ from country to country (Jiménez et al, 2007; Lutgen-Sandvik et al, 2007; Baillien and De Witte, 2009; Tambur and Vadi, 2009; Tsuno et al, 2010; Öcel and Aydin, 2012; Seo et al, 2012; Giorgi et al, 2013; Vukelić et al, 2015). Since workplace bullying is a sensitive social phenomenon it is always useful to understand specific national, cultural and economic research context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Both the Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ), and its newest version the Negative Acts Questionnaire–Revised, are probably the most internationally used and most thoroughly psychometrically explored workplace bullying inventories based on behavioral experience (e.g., McCormack et al, 2006; Jiménez et al, 2007; Lutgen-Sandvik et al, 2007; Baillien and De Witte, 2009; Einarsen et al, 2009; Tambur and Vadi, 2009; Tsuno et al, 2010; Öcel and Aydin, 2012; Seo et al, 2012; Giorgi et al, 2013; Notelaers and Einarsen, 2013; Arenas et al, 2015; Vukelić et al, 2015). The NAQ-R was developed based on previous versions of the NAQ scale that went through several quantitative and qualitative research analyses (Einarsen et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undoubtedly, not all preventive measures are suitable for absolutely all organisations and all individuals without exception. For example, results of research made by Giorgi, Ando, Arenas, Shoss, and Leon-Perez (2013) demonstrate the importance of considering individual differences as predictors of bullying and, in particular, it suggests that mental health promotion might play a role in bullying prevention. The authors state that, in addition, findings indicate that organisational interventions for workplace bullying may benefit from introducing elements aimed at improving group cohesion and organisational climate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%