2021
DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s340428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Perceptions and Acceptance of Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling among Bereaved Relatives and Health-Care Professionals in Rwanda

Abstract: Purpose In most low- and lower middle-income countries (LMICs), minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) is a relatively new procedure for identifying the cause of death (CoD). This study aimed to explore perceptions and acceptance of bereaved families and health-care professionals regarding MITS in the context of MITS initiation in Rwanda as an alternative to clinical autopsy. Methods This was a qualitative phenomenological study with thematic analysis. Participants w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(69 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding MIA, findings from many studies agreed with our findings that it could be useful to identify CoD. For studies among the general population, and for participants who had not heard of the method but had the procedure explained, they believed it could help to establish accurate CoD [20,23,24]. The minimally invasive nature of MIA was also considered a factor for people to prefer MIA over CDA, especially in studies of bereaved relatives.…”
Section: Plos Global Public Healthsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding MIA, findings from many studies agreed with our findings that it could be useful to identify CoD. For studies among the general population, and for participants who had not heard of the method but had the procedure explained, they believed it could help to establish accurate CoD [20,23,24]. The minimally invasive nature of MIA was also considered a factor for people to prefer MIA over CDA, especially in studies of bereaved relatives.…”
Section: Plos Global Public Healthsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The minimally invasive nature of MIA was also considered a factor for people to prefer MIA over CDA, especially in studies of bereaved relatives. Bereaved respondents from a study in Rwanda agreed that one of the advantages of MIA was that it did not deform or alter the body while still being able to determine CoD [23]. Expanding upon our survey's finding, this study also added that CoD identifed by MIA can prevent family conflict and dispute among community members.…”
Section: Plos Global Public Healthmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…4,7 This technique is being used in several contexts in LMICs and appears to be promising in terms of its greater acceptability because it is considered a fast, simple, and more user-friendly technique that can be performed by minimally trained staff, although there are factors considered to be important barriers that may put its acceptability at risk. [9][10][11] Existing evidence on the anticipated and experienced acceptability of the MITS procedure thus demonstrates the importance of recognizing the cultural mores and practices of the context where MITS is implemented. 9,12 Death and related post-mortem procedures are embedded in complex social, cultural, and religious environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] Existing evidence on the anticipated and experienced acceptability of the MITS procedure thus demonstrates the importance of recognizing the cultural mores and practices of the context where MITS is implemented. 9,12 Death and related post-mortem procedures are embedded in complex social, cultural, and religious environments. 9,10 In the case of Zamb ezia province (central Mozambique), the existence of myths, rumors, and negative perceptions of certain public health initiatives, as was the case with cholera control, 13 could challenge the success of the implementation of MITS in this setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation