2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2016.7795559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring pedestrian Bluetooth and WiFi detection at public transportation terminals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was not possible as the arrival time of bus passengers at the stop cannot be determined due to the check-in hardware being located inside the bus. However, recent research efforts have enabled the use of new technology such as capturing waiting passengers using Bluetooth or Wi-Fi detection from smartphones (Shlayan et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussion and Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was not possible as the arrival time of bus passengers at the stop cannot be determined due to the check-in hardware being located inside the bus. However, recent research efforts have enabled the use of new technology such as capturing waiting passengers using Bluetooth or Wi-Fi detection from smartphones (Shlayan et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussion and Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crowd data collection and monitoring (Abedi, Bhaskar, & Chung, 2013), and combining data from both sensor types (WiFi and Bluetooth), results in useful insights into pedestrian dynamics (Heuvel, Ton, & Hermansen, 2016). Previous research has also used WiFi and Bluetooth data of pedestrians inside terminals (Shlayan, Kurkcu, & Ozbay, 2016). This research attempts to detect moving pedestrians and their behavioral patterns within the terminal and to create an origin-destination motion matrix.…”
Section: Wifi and Non-passenger Data Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pedestrian data can be estimated with the system to detect unknown MAC addresses of devices at short distances at fixed locations (Jackson et al, 2014) and the performance of the BT-WiFi method evaluated to identify these unknown MAC addresses (Lesani & Moreno, 2016). Lastly, the research uses WiFi devices paired permanently in strategic locations (Lesani et al, 2016), and the use of software installed on smartphones; it should be noted that most pedestrians do not make use of this software (Shlayan et al, 2016). This research will describe and explain WiFi scanner data in Obuse, a tourist spot in Japan.…”
Section: Wifi and Non-passenger Data Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research that detects human movement uses high Wi-Fi frequencies, connected with GPS so that the position of the MAC addresses or access points can be identified (Sapiezynski et al, 2015). The use of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth in public terminal transportation has also been applied in a high and wide frequency to capture MAC addresses so the travel behavior of pedestrian patterns can be identified and understood in terms of seconds and minutes (Shlayan et al, 2016). This public terminal transportation research considers high-frequency Wi-Fi detected data compared with Bluetooth data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%