Exploring Parental Perspectives of Childhood Speech and Language Disorders Across 10 Countries: A Pilot Qualitative Study

Abstract

Purpose Although researchers have explored parental perspectives of childhood speech and language disorders, most studies have been conducted in English-speaking countries. Little is known about parental experiences across countries, where procedures of language screening and services for language disorders differ. The authors participated in the COST 1 Action network IS1406, “Enhancing Children's Oral Language Skills Across Europe and Beyond,” which provided an opportunity to conduct cross-country qualitative interviews with parents. The aim of this pilot study was to explore ways in which parents construed and described speech and language disorders across countries. Method Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with parents from 10 families in 10 different countries. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings The overall theme was “acknowledging parental expertise.” The parents described, in detail, ways in which their children's speech and language (dis)abilities had an impact on the children's everyday life. Three subthemes were identified: impairment, disability, and changes over time. Conclusions The findings suggest that, across a range of countries, parents demonstrated contextualized understandings of their children's speech and language (dis)abilities, along with the everyday functional implications of the disorders. Hence, despite not holding professional knowledge about language disorders, the voices, views, understandings, and personal experiences of parents in relation to their child's disorder should be listened to when planning therapy services. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14109881

Efficacy, model of delivery, intensity and targets of pragmatic interventions for children with developmental language disorder: A systematic review

“…In that case, two facts should be kept in mind: (1) as stated by Allen and Marshall (2011), the motivation of parents to participate in the intervention is an important variable: even the shortest intervention requires involvement and consistency that sometimes parents cannot ensure, and this may influence on the effectiveness of the intervention; and (2) involvement of a third person in the implementation of intervention does not mean replacement of the SPL. Parents can be good partners if they are motivated and well mentored by a speech–language therapist or specialists in the field, and they also have good knowledge of which areas of pragmatics are challenging for their child (Jensen de López et al., 2021) but this does not mean that they can completely replace a speech–language therapist. As Fey et al.…”

Does the public know what researchers know? Perceived task difficulty impacts adults’ intuitions about children’s early word learning

“…The link between beliefs and behaviors is a longstanding research area in social science (e.g., Bornstein et al, 2017). Prior research has shown that adults make assumptions about children’s cognition and adjust their behavior based on these assumptions (e.g., linguistic tuning hypothesis; Jensen de López et al, 2021 ; MacPhee, 1983 ; Sigel & McGillicuddy-De Lisi, 2002 ; Snow, 1972 ; Yurovsky et al, 2016 ). Their beliefs and behaviors surrounding children’s language development can even influence children’s long-term language outcomes (Bojczyk et al, 2016 ; Donahue et al, 1997 ; Del Vecchio et al, 2014 ; Hunt & Paraskevopoulos, 1980 ; Jimerson & Bond, 2001 ; Winstanley et al, 2014 ; Zippert & Ramani, 2017 ).…”

Narrative therapy with children: A qualitative interview study with Danish therapists about the application of narrative practices

“…Finally, themes were refined, and transcripts were re‐read to ensure no important points were missed. The interviews and analysis were conducted in Danish, and, in accordance with Jensen de López et al (2021), extracts of the data were not translated to English before the final themes were refined. This was done to respect the original meaning of each interview in the process of analysis.…”