2018
DOI: 10.1111/jam.14168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) substrate preparation by varying phase I composting time: changes in bacterial communities and physicochemical composition of biomass impacting mushroom yields

Abstract: Aims To investigate characterization of the bacterial community composition and functionality and their impact on substrate biodegradation as well as mushroom yield. Methods and Results Bacterial diversity, composition and functionality were accessed by DNA‐derived analysis for a sugarcane straw‐based substrate composted for either 5, 10 or 15 days. In addition, carbon and nitrogen losses, carbohydrate conversion and mushroom yields were measured for the different treatments. Changes were observed in the bacte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bacterial genera can be more or less abundant depending on starting material, composting procedure, and analytical methodologies. For example, the dominant bacterial genera, including Pseudomonas , Sphingomonas , Bacillus , Geobacillus , Ureibacillus , Pseudoxanthomonas , and Thermobispora , were identified from composted P. ostreatus substrate when using wheat straw–alfalfa mixture as the starting material [ 16 ], while Acinetobacter , Pseudoxanthomonas , Sphingobacterium , Terribacillus , Thermobacillus , and Thermobispora were the dominant microbial genera in sugarcane straw compost [ 17 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bacterial genera can be more or less abundant depending on starting material, composting procedure, and analytical methodologies. For example, the dominant bacterial genera, including Pseudomonas , Sphingomonas , Bacillus , Geobacillus , Ureibacillus , Pseudoxanthomonas , and Thermobispora , were identified from composted P. ostreatus substrate when using wheat straw–alfalfa mixture as the starting material [ 16 ], while Acinetobacter , Pseudoxanthomonas , Sphingobacterium , Terribacillus , Thermobacillus , and Thermobispora were the dominant microbial genera in sugarcane straw compost [ 17 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil nitrate would likely decline faster in intercropping and mushroom monoculture treatments in comparison with maize monoculture, mostly due to decomposition of mineral nutrients by saprotrophs and leaching losses [35], using intermittent spray irrigation to maintain the optimum moisture for mushroom production. Vieira et al [36] also showed that nitrogen losses after 10 and 15 days impacted by mushroom yield. In this study, intercropping treatment significantly increased the contents of SOM compared with maize monoculture.…”
Section: Soil Physicochemical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although mechanisms involving biocontrol of green mold from biofungicides have been barely described, according to Pandin et al [121,122], the mechanisms acting in the antagonism of T. aggressivum by B. velezensis QST713 may be a combination of (i) competence in the environmental niche through the formation of competitive biofilm to exclude T. aggressivum, (ii) production and secretion of compounds with antifungal activity against the parasite, and (iii) release of signaling molecules, such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or the quorum-sensing-controlled processes, which can lead to defense response in A. bisporus or reduce parasite activity. The environmental niche where mushrooms develop and fructify is a highly dynamic and rich microbiome where multiple agents act and its configuration may have a direct impact on yield performance and disease occurrence [32,123,124]. Bacteria genera inhabiting casing material, including Bacillus and Pseudomonas, can be responsible for the casing fungistasis of mycoparasites observed in the absence of the host mycelium [125], however, the host mycelium modifies the microbiome structure breaking the fungistatic equilibrium and the native microbiota results inefficient to suppress mycoparasites under conditions of high disease pressure [32,48].…”
Section: Alternative Control and Breedingmentioning
confidence: 99%