Exploring Nurse and Patient Experiences of Developing Rapport During Oncology Ambulatory Care Videoconferencing Visits: Qualitative Descriptive Study

Abstract

Background Although videoconferencing between oncology patients and nurses became routine during the pandemic, little is known about the development of clinician-patient rapport in this care environment. Evidence that virtual visits may challenge nurses’ ability to form connections with patients, demonstrate empathy, and provide support suggests that videoconferencing may not ensure optimal care for persons with cancer. Establishing rapport during videoconferencing visits (VCVs) is important in oncology nursing, as rapport enables the nurse to provide emotional support and assistance to patients as they navigate their cancer journey. Objective This study investigated the nature of nurse-patient rapport in ambulatory cancer care videoconferencing telehealth visits. Objectives included exploring (1) how patients with cancer and nurses describe experiences of and strategies for cultivating rapport and (2) similarities and differences between rapport in videoconferencing and in-person visits (IPVs). Methods In this qualitative descriptive study, interviews were conducted from October 2021 to March 2022 with 22 participants, including patients with cancer (n=10, 45%) and oncology nurses (n=12, 55%), about their experiences of rapport building during VCVs. All interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Data from nurses and patients were analyzed separately using identical procedures, with a comparative analysis of patient and nurse results performed in the final analysis. Results Most patients in the study had experienced 3-5 video visits within the past 12 months (n=7, 70%). Half of the nurse participants (n=6, 50%) reported having participated in over 100 VCVs, and all had experiences with videoconferencing (ranging from 3 to 960 visits) over the past 12 months. In total, 3 themes and 6 categories were derived from the patient data, and 4 themes and 13 categories were derived from the nurse data. Comparisons of themes derived from participant interviews identified similarities in how nurses and patients described experiences of rapport during VCVs. Three themes fit the collective data: (1) person-centered and relationship-based care is valued and foundational to nurse-patient rapport in oncology ambulatory care regardless of how care is delivered, (2) adapting a bedside manner to facilitate rapport during VCVs is feasible, and (3) nurses and patients can work together to create person-centered options across the care trajectory to ensure quality care outcomes. Barriers to relationship building in VCVs included unexpected interruptions from others, breaks in the internet connection, concerns about privacy, and limitations associated with not being physically present. Conclusions Person-centered and relationship-based approaches can be adapted to support nurse-patient rapport in VCVs, including forming a personal connection with the patient and using active listening techniques. Balancing the challenges and limitations with the benefits of videoconferencing is an essential competency requiring additional research and guidelines. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/27940

Digital skills of health care professionals in cancer care: A systematic review

“…The studies were conducted in USA, 28 – 36 Canada, 37 – 40 Australia, 41 – 44 England, 45 , 46 Netherlands, 47 , 48 Denmark, 49 Rwanda 50 and Turkey. 51 Designs of the studies were qualitative ( n = 12, 50%), 28 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 38 , 40 , 41 , 43 , 48 – 50 quantitative ( n = 10, 42%), 29 , 30 , 33 , 36 , 39 , 42 , 44 , 46 , 47 , 51 mixed method ( n = 1, 4%) 41 and a strategy paper ( n = 1, 4%). 45 Data was collected primarily by interviews ( n = 10, 42%), 31 , 32 , 34 ,…”

“… 51 Designs of the studies were qualitative ( n = 12, 50%), 28 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 38 , 40 , 41 , 43 , 48 – 50 quantitative ( n = 10, 42%), 29 , 30 , 33 , 36 , 39 , 42 , 44 , 46 , 47 , 51 mixed method ( n = 1, 4%) 41 and a strategy paper ( n = 1, 4%). 45 Data was collected primarily by interviews ( n = 10, 42%), 31 , 32 , 34 , 35 , 37 , 38 , 41 , 43 , 49 , 50 or by surveys ( n = 7, 30%). 29 , 30 , 33 , 36 , 42 , 47 , 51 The participants were HCPs in different cancer care settings: nurses ( n = 4, 8%), 31 , 33 , 37 , 39 medical oncology providers ( n = 1, 4%), 3...…”

Barriers to Video Call–Based Telehealth in Allied Health Professions and Nursing: Scoping Review and Mapping Process

“…In total, 80% (45/56) of publications focused on 1 specific health care profession [29,[42][43][44][45][46][47][49][50][51][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][63][64][65][66][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][77][78][79][80][81][83][84][85][86][88][89][90][91]93,94,96], and 20% (11/56) of articles targeted a mix of health care professions [48,52,[60][61][62]67,…”

“…The studies focused on various health contexts. Health professionals treated various target groups (27/56, 48%) [42,45,[47][48][49][50][51]53,54,58,60,63,67,73,75,78,79,81,83,85,86,[89][90][91][92][93][94] or focused on specific target groups, such as children (13/56, 23%) [29,45,52,55,61,66,71,72,76,82,84,87,95] or older adults (2/56, 4%) [59,96], or patients with specific diseases or issues, such as musculoskeletal disorders (2/56, 4%) [62,77], cancer (3/56, 5%) [44,69,88], osteoarthritis (3/56, 5%) [43,74,…”

“…The publications were from the United States (12/56, 21%) [45,47,52,55,56,68,70,72,76,81,87,88], Australia (12/56, 21%) [43,48,51,57,[62][63][64]71,78,[83][84][85], the United Kingdom (5/56, 9%) [42,46,66,86,90], Israel (4/56, 7%) [58,61,73,96], India (4/56, 7%) [53,75,79,89], Canada (3/56, 5%) [29,65,95], Germany (2/56, 4%) [59,92], Kuwait (2/56, 4%) [49,77], Norway (2/56, 4%) [44,69], Iran (1/56, 2%) [50], Hong Kong (1/56, 2%) [54], Switzerland (1/56, 2%) [60], Austria (1/56, 2%)…”